From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 115989 invoked by alias); 9 Mar 2017 12:47:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 115930 invoked by uid 89); 9 Mar 2017 12:47:26 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=msg00433html, Or=c5=a1uli=c4, 2016-03, oruli?= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 12:47:25 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6097215561; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 12:47:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn04.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.4]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v29ClOFI014521; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 07:47:24 -0500 Subject: Re: Rvalue references support? To: =?UTF-8?B?SnVyYWogT3LFoXVsacSH?= , gdb@sourceware.org References: From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <5f0b16e4-8d9d-0312-5d93-d1cb87662d98@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 12:47:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2017-03/txt/msg00011.txt.bz2 On 03/09/2017 12:16 PM, Juraj Oršulić wrote: > Hello, I was wondering if rvalue references could be debugged from > gdb. A series for patches was sent for review in March 2016. Is this > eventually going to be accepted? > > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2016-03/msg00433.html Yeah... This is mostly been approved with some nits, but it has lingered on with no one doing the final work. Keith revived that patch recently, and found some further issues with overload resolution, IIUC. I think it's going to be too late for 8.0 to address those, but given that rvalue refs just don't work at all currently, I think that we should at least make sure that that series is included in the incoming GDB 8.0 as is. We can always address the discovered problems afterwards. But maybe Keith has already sorted everything out... Stay tuned. Thanks, Pedro Alves