From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 125439 invoked by alias); 9 Mar 2017 12:17:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 125422 invoked by uid 89); 9 Mar 2017 12:17:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*F:D*hr X-HELO: mail.fer.hr Received: from mail5.fer.hr (HELO mail.fer.hr) (161.53.72.235) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 12:17:41 +0000 Received: from POSTAR.fer.hr (2001:b68:16:250::72:237) by MAIL5.fer.hr (2001:b68:16:250::72:235) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 13:17:38 +0100 Received: from mail-wm0-f51.google.com (74.125.82.51) by POSTAR.fer.hr (161.53.72.237) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 13:17:37 +0100 Received: by mail-wm0-f51.google.com with SMTP id v186so137851039wmd.0 for ; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 04:17:37 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nXkubkC2fgZmj7ykAqYENixPLjs1NlQ3R4EKlgOdc2phFCI8uaOIeMRhkie+cOtcG0+xyUgeoxDG/N7A== X-Received: by 10.28.92.212 with SMTP id q203mr10000164wmb.73.1489061857285; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 04:17:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.224.139 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 04:16:57 -0800 (PST) From: =?UTF-8?B?SnVyYWogT3LFoXVsacSH?= Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 12:17:00 -0000 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Rvalue references support? To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SW-Source: 2017-03/txt/msg00009.txt.bz2 Hello, I was wondering if rvalue references could be debugged from gdb. A series for patches was sent for review in March 2016. Is this eventually going to be accepted? https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2016-03/msg00433.html Regards, Juraj Or=C5=A1uli=C4=87