Re: [discuss] Support for reverse-execution

[Paul Schlie <schlie@comcast.net>]

> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
>> On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 10:13:04AM -0400, Paul Schlie wrote:
>>> When someone implements reversible debugging in a free simulator and
>>> wants to integrate that with GDB, they'll have the choice of doing the
>>> remaining steps in their simulator or in GDB.
>> 
>> - Although our views may differ, I accept and support the simple reality
>>   that those to invest the time and resources in a development, have the
>>   greatest say in the decisions. (In this case if the desire is to define
>>   an interface for a single lone proprietary tool, likely in satisfaction or
>>   natural result of a commercial commercial contract to do so, then let it
>>   be; but attempting to justify it as a good thing is a bit of a stretch).
> 
> Paul, I have said repeatedly in this discussion that I think this is a
> natural, valid, good interface to the functionality.  That's my
> considered opinion; I am not trying to justify anything by it.
> 
> Please take a deep breath and stop tossing accusation around if you
> want to be taken seriously.

- Agreed, sorry.