From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
Cc: drow@mvista.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [discuss] Support for reverse-execution
Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 09:39:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01c55de8$Blat.v2.4$7546d7a0@zahav.net.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <428E53AD.7010306@redhat.com> (message from Michael Snyder on Fri, 20 May 2005 14:16:29 -0700)
> Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 14:16:29 -0700
> From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
>
> > Sounds like a very useful feature. However, I think we need to
> > support giving meaningful names to bookmarks, since a (more or less
> > arbitrary) number used by the target is going to lack any mnemonic
> > value.
>
> How about counting numbers, like we do with breakpoints?
That might be okay as well, but I consider the method of numbering
breakpoints as not an ideal one, either. It's impossible to manage
more than 3 breakpoints without "info breakpoints". More mnemonic
names could have allowed us to know what breakpoint we need to use
without consulting the table displayed by "info breakpoints".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-21 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-20 21:16 Michael Snyder
2005-05-20 21:31 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-21 9:39 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2005-05-23 18:19 ` Michael Snyder
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-05-21 15:53 Paul Schlie
2005-05-20 22:11 Michael Snyder
2005-05-20 23:32 ` Paul Schlie
2005-05-20 21:59 Michael Snyder
2005-05-20 21:51 Michael Snyder
2005-05-21 9:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-20 21:44 Michael Snyder
2005-05-20 21:25 Michael Snyder
2005-05-20 21:11 Michael Snyder
2005-05-20 21:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-20 19:02 Michael Snyder
2005-05-20 20:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-20 21:03 ` Michael Snyder
2005-05-20 15:49 Paul Schlie
2005-05-20 17:41 ` Dan Shearer
2005-05-20 22:01 ` Paul Schlie
2005-05-20 22:08 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-20 22:43 ` Paul Schlie
2005-05-21 0:58 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-21 1:42 ` Paul Schlie
2005-05-21 1:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-21 1:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-21 15:03 ` Paul Schlie
2005-05-21 14:13 ` Paul Schlie
2005-05-21 14:23 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-21 15:04 ` Paul Schlie
2005-05-20 20:58 ` Michael Snyder
2005-05-20 21:35 ` Paul Schlie
2005-05-19 1:23 Dan Shearer
2005-05-19 13:01 ` Johan Rydberg
2005-05-19 13:18 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-19 13:47 ` Johan Rydberg
2005-05-20 10:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-20 11:37 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-05-20 13:18 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-20 13:36 ` Fabian Cenedese
2005-05-20 13:47 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-20 14:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-20 22:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-20 12:22 ` Johan Rydberg
2005-05-20 13:19 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-20 14:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-20 13:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-20 14:34 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-20 15:40 ` Johan Rydberg
2005-05-20 10:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-16 17:47 Dan Shearer
2005-05-16 18:04 ` Dan Shearer
2005-05-20 18:15 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-21 0:05 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2005-05-21 10:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-21 10:28 ` Russell Shaw
2005-05-21 12:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-21 12:55 ` Russell Shaw
2005-05-21 14:39 ` Russell Shaw
2005-05-21 14:19 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-21 15:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-21 17:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-23 19:39 ` Dan Shearer
2005-05-12 23:08 Michael Snyder
2005-05-13 6:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-19 13:46 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-19 18:46 ` Michael Snyder
2005-05-19 19:26 ` Johan Rydberg
2005-05-20 10:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-20 13:04 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-20 14:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-20 14:43 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-05-20 20:48 ` Michael Snyder
2005-05-20 20:51 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-20 20:38 ` Michael Snyder
2005-05-20 15:05 ` Vladimir Prus
2005-05-20 15:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-20 18:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-20 18:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-20 19:27 ` Stan Shebs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='01c55de8$Blat.v2.4$7546d7a0@zahav.net.il' \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=msnyder@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox