* Hmm, GCC are catching up :-)
@ 2001-08-17 21:56 Andrew Cagney
2001-08-20 12:31 ` Jonathan Larmour
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2001-08-17 21:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb
See:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-08/msg00824.html
GDB has been persuing this strategy for some time.
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Hmm, GCC are catching up :-)
2001-08-17 21:56 Hmm, GCC are catching up :-) Andrew Cagney
@ 2001-08-20 12:31 ` Jonathan Larmour
2001-08-21 6:42 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Larmour @ 2001-08-20 12:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ac131313; +Cc: gdb
In article < 3B7DF561.6070609@cygnus.com > you write:
>See:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-08/msg00824.html
>
>GDB has been persuing this strategy for some time.
Won't this potentially cause undefined references at -O0? Or is
the point that GCC prunes dead code even at -O0?
Jifl
--
Red Hat, Rustat House, Clifton Road, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 (1223) 271062
Maybe this world is another planet's Hell -Aldous Huxley || Opinions==mine
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Hmm, GCC are catching up :-)
2001-08-20 12:31 ` Jonathan Larmour
@ 2001-08-21 6:42 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2001-08-21 6:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Larmour; +Cc: gdb
> In article < 3B7DF561.6070609@cygnus.com > you write:
>
>>See:
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-08/msg00824.html
>>
>>GDB has been persuing this strategy for some time.
>
>
> Won't this potentially cause undefined references at -O0? Or is
> the point that GCC prunes dead code even at -O0?
It is that GCC (and the GNU coding standard) are moving away from #ifdef
spagetti.code - a brave but necessary decision.
This is something GDB, due to multi-arch, has been persuing for some time.
enjoy,
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-08-21 6:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-08-17 21:56 Hmm, GCC are catching up :-) Andrew Cagney
2001-08-20 12:31 ` Jonathan Larmour
2001-08-21 6:42 ` Andrew Cagney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox