From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Jonathan Larmour <jlarmour@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Hmm, GCC are catching up :-)
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 06:42:00 -0000
Message-id: <3B817D95.7060504@cygnus.com>
References: <200108201931.f7KJVkn18615@localhost.localdomain>
X-SW-Source: 2001-08/msg00168.html

> In article < 3B7DF561.6070609@cygnus.com > you write:
> 
>>See:
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-08/msg00824.html
>>
>>GDB has been persuing this strategy for some time.
> 
> 
> Won't this potentially cause undefined references at -O0? Or is
> the point that GCC prunes dead code even at -O0?

It is that GCC (and the GNU coding standard) are moving away from #ifdef 
spagetti.code - a brave but necessary decision.

This is something GDB, due to multi-arch, has been persuing for some time.

	enjoy,
	Andrew