From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: jlarmour@redhat.com (Jonathan Larmour)
To: ac131313@cygnus.com
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Hmm, GCC are catching up :-)
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 12:31:00 -0000
Message-id: <200108201931.f7KJVkn18615@localhost.localdomain>
References: <3B7DF561.6070609@cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-08/msg00156.html

In article < 3B7DF561.6070609@cygnus.com > you write:
>See:
>
>	http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-08/msg00824.html
>
>GDB has been persuing this strategy for some time.

Won't this potentially cause undefined references at -O0? Or is
the point that GCC prunes dead code even at -O0?

Jifl
-- 
Red Hat, Rustat House, Clifton Road, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 (1223) 271062
Maybe this world is another planet's Hell -Aldous Huxley || Opinions==mine