* Hmm, GCC are catching up :-) @ 2001-08-17 21:56 Andrew Cagney 2001-08-20 12:31 ` Jonathan Larmour 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Andrew Cagney @ 2001-08-17 21:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gdb See: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-08/msg00824.html GDB has been persuing this strategy for some time. Andrew ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Hmm, GCC are catching up :-) 2001-08-17 21:56 Hmm, GCC are catching up :-) Andrew Cagney @ 2001-08-20 12:31 ` Jonathan Larmour 2001-08-21 6:42 ` Andrew Cagney 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Jonathan Larmour @ 2001-08-20 12:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ac131313; +Cc: gdb In article < 3B7DF561.6070609@cygnus.com > you write: >See: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-08/msg00824.html > >GDB has been persuing this strategy for some time. Won't this potentially cause undefined references at -O0? Or is the point that GCC prunes dead code even at -O0? Jifl -- Red Hat, Rustat House, Clifton Road, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 (1223) 271062 Maybe this world is another planet's Hell -Aldous Huxley || Opinions==mine ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Hmm, GCC are catching up :-) 2001-08-20 12:31 ` Jonathan Larmour @ 2001-08-21 6:42 ` Andrew Cagney 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Andrew Cagney @ 2001-08-21 6:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jonathan Larmour; +Cc: gdb > In article < 3B7DF561.6070609@cygnus.com > you write: > >>See: >> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-08/msg00824.html >> >>GDB has been persuing this strategy for some time. > > > Won't this potentially cause undefined references at -O0? Or is > the point that GCC prunes dead code even at -O0? It is that GCC (and the GNU coding standard) are moving away from #ifdef spagetti.code - a brave but necessary decision. This is something GDB, due to multi-arch, has been persuing for some time. enjoy, Andrew ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-08-21 6:42 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2001-08-17 21:56 Hmm, GCC are catching up :-) Andrew Cagney 2001-08-20 12:31 ` Jonathan Larmour 2001-08-21 6:42 ` Andrew Cagney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox