Re: [maint] The GDB maintenance process

[Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>]

On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 03:17:09PM -0800, Jason Molenda wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 03:39:50PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>I know that Jason likes svn but I haven't used it.  I'm not sure that
>>it would be easy to convince me to spend any time trying to convert
>>everything to a new source control system.  CVS is nice because it
>>lives everywhere and is a known commodity.
>
>I don't think I saw anyone suggesting alternative SCMs...  cagney wrote
>"sware, subversion, sourceforge", but he probably meant to write
>"subversions", as in "subversions.gnu.org".

I probably responded one message too late.  David Carlton said this:

>It might be nice if GDB were using a source code management tool that
>didn't depend on having a single repository, making it easier for
>people to maintain public branches elsewhere but to still sync them
>with an official branch.

So when I saw Andrew mention subversion, I thought we were still talking
about source control systems rather than systems which run source
control systems.

cgf