From: Arnaud Charlet <charlet@ACT-Europe.FR>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnaud Charlet <charlet@ACT-Europe.FR>,
Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>,
gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Various] obsoleting the annotate level 2 interface
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 08:55:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030129095458.B24931@dublin.int.act-europe.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E3768D5.1060504@redhat.com>; from ac131313@redhat.com on Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 12:38:29AM -0500
> The proposal is to drop level-two annotation but retain level one
> indefinitly. It is level-two that causes all the grief in the code.
Thanks for clarifying. Since there were definitely different messages saying
different things on this subject, I'm glad this is clarified, and good
to hear that annotate 1 is not going to disappear.
Arno
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-29 8:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-28 20:05 Jim Blandy
2003-01-28 20:36 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-29 6:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2003-01-29 21:56 ` Jim Blandy
2003-01-28 22:29 ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-01-29 5:38 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-29 8:55 ` Arnaud Charlet [this message]
2003-01-29 15:19 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-29 15:31 ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-01-29 15:43 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-29 15:51 ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-01-29 15:55 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-01-29 16:01 ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-01-29 16:19 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-29 16:34 ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-01-29 17:16 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-29 19:03 ` Tom Tromey
2003-01-29 22:38 ` Jim Blandy
2003-01-29 17:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2003-01-31 20:14 Nick Roberts
2003-01-31 20:56 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-01-31 21:10 ` Andrew Cagney
[not found] ` <15931.6572.456534.588251@nick.uklinux.net>
[not found] ` <15931.8581.923838.921739@localhost.redhat.com>
2003-02-01 16:16 ` Nick Roberts
2003-01-31 22:33 ` Nick Roberts
2003-02-01 4:13 ` Jim Blandy
[not found] <1044050405.3227.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com>
2003-02-01 0:43 ` Jim Ingham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030129095458.B24931@dublin.int.act-europe.fr \
--to=charlet@act-europe.fr \
--cc=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=jimb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox