From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
Cc: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Various] obsoleting the annotate level 2 interface
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 06:14:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1030129080955.11962E-100000@is> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E36E9C2.9000700@redhat.com>
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> We may also want to print out the fact that level two annotations are
> deprecated.
IMHO, it definitely needs to be stated in a very visible place that
level-2 annotations are deprecated. But I think it's more important to
work on what's missing in MI, because it should be clear that as it
currently stands, MI is not a complete solution to a GDB front end.
I actually tried very hard to convince the gdb-ui developer to use MI
from day one, but given the lack of support for CLI commands, and the
fact that no one of the GDB developers stepped forward to add the missing
features when gdb-ui was still in limbo, I had no alternative but to
agree that for now, level-2 annotations are the only practical way to go.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-29 6:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-28 20:05 Jim Blandy
2003-01-28 20:36 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-29 6:14 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2003-01-29 21:56 ` Jim Blandy
2003-01-28 22:29 ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-01-29 5:38 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-29 8:55 ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-01-29 15:19 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-29 15:31 ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-01-29 15:43 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-29 15:51 ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-01-29 15:55 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-01-29 16:01 ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-01-29 16:19 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-29 16:34 ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-01-29 17:16 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-29 19:03 ` Tom Tromey
2003-01-29 22:38 ` Jim Blandy
2003-01-29 17:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2003-01-31 20:14 Nick Roberts
2003-01-31 20:56 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-01-31 21:10 ` Andrew Cagney
[not found] ` <15931.6572.456534.588251@nick.uklinux.net>
[not found] ` <15931.8581.923838.921739@localhost.redhat.com>
2003-02-01 16:16 ` Nick Roberts
2003-01-31 22:33 ` Nick Roberts
2003-02-01 4:13 ` Jim Blandy
[not found] <1044050405.3227.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com>
2003-02-01 0:43 ` Jim Ingham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.SUN.3.91.1030129080955.11962E-100000@is \
--to=eliz@is.elta.co.il \
--cc=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=jimb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox