Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
To: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>
Cc: Nick Roberts <nick@nick.uklinux.net>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Various] obsoleting the annotate level 2 interface
Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2003 04:13:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <vt2ptqc7idw.fsf@zenia.red-bean.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15930.58372.75272.21296@localhost.redhat.com>


Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com> writes:
> I don't understand. The on line doc is up to date, it is not
> lying. Those commands have not been implememted. We have gone through
> 3 projects (one internal to Cygnus, eclipse, and the apple ui) and
> none of those missing commands was obviously a show stopper. Of course
> those are *new* GUIs and they can be less functional. Emacs cannot go
> backwards because some commands are missing. Does emacs need these
> commands? for instance, does emacs have a window that shows the
> threads of the inferior?

Well, we should be clear, here: the most recent Emacs release uses
only annotation level 1.  It's only a not-yet-released Emacs that has
a just-added mode that uses annotation level 2.  So if GDB were to
delete annotate level 2 today, Emacs would not lose any functionality.
(I am not suggesting that we delete annotation level 2 today, it's
just a rhetorical device.)


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-02-01  4:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-01-31 20:14 Nick Roberts
2003-01-31 20:56 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-01-31 21:10   ` Andrew Cagney
     [not found]     ` <15931.6572.456534.588251@nick.uklinux.net>
     [not found]       ` <15931.8581.923838.921739@localhost.redhat.com>
2003-02-01 16:16         ` Nick Roberts
2003-01-31 22:33   ` Nick Roberts
2003-02-01  4:13   ` Jim Blandy [this message]
     [not found] <1044050405.3227.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com>
2003-02-01  0:43 ` Jim Ingham
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-28 20:05 Jim Blandy
2003-01-28 20:36 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-29  6:14   ` Eli Zaretskii
2003-01-29 21:56     ` Jim Blandy
2003-01-28 22:29 ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-01-29  5:38   ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-29  8:55     ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-01-29 15:19       ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-29 15:31         ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-01-29 15:43           ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-29 15:51             ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-01-29 15:55               ` Christopher Faylor
2003-01-29 16:01                 ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-01-29 16:19                   ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-29 16:34                     ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-01-29 17:16                       ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-29 19:03                       ` Tom Tromey
2003-01-29 22:38                         ` Jim Blandy
2003-01-29 17:19         ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=vt2ptqc7idw.fsf@zenia.red-bean.com \
    --to=jimb@redhat.com \
    --cc=ezannoni@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=nick@nick.uklinux.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox