From: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
To: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>
Cc: Nick Roberts <nick@nick.uklinux.net>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Various] obsoleting the annotate level 2 interface
Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2003 04:13:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <vt2ptqc7idw.fsf@zenia.red-bean.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15930.58372.75272.21296@localhost.redhat.com>
Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com> writes:
> I don't understand. The on line doc is up to date, it is not
> lying. Those commands have not been implememted. We have gone through
> 3 projects (one internal to Cygnus, eclipse, and the apple ui) and
> none of those missing commands was obviously a show stopper. Of course
> those are *new* GUIs and they can be less functional. Emacs cannot go
> backwards because some commands are missing. Does emacs need these
> commands? for instance, does emacs have a window that shows the
> threads of the inferior?
Well, we should be clear, here: the most recent Emacs release uses
only annotation level 1. It's only a not-yet-released Emacs that has
a just-added mode that uses annotation level 2. So if GDB were to
delete annotate level 2 today, Emacs would not lose any functionality.
(I am not suggesting that we delete annotation level 2 today, it's
just a rhetorical device.)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-01 4:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-31 20:14 Nick Roberts
2003-01-31 20:56 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-01-31 21:10 ` Andrew Cagney
[not found] ` <15931.6572.456534.588251@nick.uklinux.net>
[not found] ` <15931.8581.923838.921739@localhost.redhat.com>
2003-02-01 16:16 ` Nick Roberts
2003-01-31 22:33 ` Nick Roberts
2003-02-01 4:13 ` Jim Blandy [this message]
[not found] <1044050405.3227.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com>
2003-02-01 0:43 ` Jim Ingham
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-28 20:05 Jim Blandy
2003-01-28 20:36 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-29 6:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2003-01-29 21:56 ` Jim Blandy
2003-01-28 22:29 ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-01-29 5:38 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-29 8:55 ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-01-29 15:19 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-29 15:31 ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-01-29 15:43 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-29 15:51 ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-01-29 15:55 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-01-29 16:01 ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-01-29 16:19 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-29 16:34 ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-01-29 17:16 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-29 19:03 ` Tom Tromey
2003-01-29 22:38 ` Jim Blandy
2003-01-29 17:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=vt2ptqc7idw.fsf@zenia.red-bean.com \
--to=jimb@redhat.com \
--cc=ezannoni@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=nick@nick.uklinux.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox