Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
To: ac131313@redhat.com
Cc: charlet@ACT-Europe.FR, jimb@redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Various] obsoleting the annotate level 2 interface
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 17:19:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7458-Wed29Jan2003191700+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E37F0F2.7020506@redhat.com> (message from Andrew Cagney on Wed, 29 Jan 2003 10:19:14 -0500)

> Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 10:19:14 -0500
> From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
> 
> I don't know about you, but if my project was in this situtation I'd be 
> doing everything possible to move away from annotations and towards MI.

I agree with that, but if the front-end programmer cannot become a GDB
hacker, this approach might be impractical when he/she bumps into a
few problems in the current MI code.  That's what happened with the
gdb-gui.el programmer for Emacs.

So I think that if we want the front-ends to switch to MI ASAP,
someone on the GDB maintenance team should work with front-end
programmers on resolving the issues they raise.  We need to be
responsive to any bugs they report for them to get the feeling that
MI's support solves their problems.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-01-29 17:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-01-28 20:05 Jim Blandy
2003-01-28 20:36 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-29  6:14   ` Eli Zaretskii
2003-01-29 21:56     ` Jim Blandy
2003-01-28 22:29 ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-01-29  5:38   ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-29  8:55     ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-01-29 15:19       ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-29 15:31         ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-01-29 15:43           ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-29 15:51             ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-01-29 15:55               ` Christopher Faylor
2003-01-29 16:01                 ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-01-29 16:19                   ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-29 16:34                     ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-01-29 17:16                       ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-29 19:03                       ` Tom Tromey
2003-01-29 22:38                         ` Jim Blandy
2003-01-29 17:19         ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2003-01-31 20:14 Nick Roberts
2003-01-31 20:56 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-01-31 21:10   ` Andrew Cagney
     [not found]     ` <15931.6572.456534.588251@nick.uklinux.net>
     [not found]       ` <15931.8581.923838.921739@localhost.redhat.com>
2003-02-01 16:16         ` Nick Roberts
2003-01-31 22:33   ` Nick Roberts
2003-02-01  4:13   ` Jim Blandy
     [not found] <1044050405.3227.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com>
2003-02-01  0:43 ` Jim Ingham

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7458-Wed29Jan2003191700+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il \
    --to=eliz@is.elta.co.il \
    --cc=ac131313@redhat.com \
    --cc=charlet@ACT-Europe.FR \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=jimb@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox