From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 737 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2003 08:55:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 728 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2003 08:54:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dublin.ACT-Europe.FR) (212.157.227.154) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 29 Jan 2003 08:54:59 -0000 Received: by dublin.ACT-Europe.FR (Postfix, from userid 525) id 5FB2922A1C0; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 09:54:58 +0100 (MET) Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 08:55:00 -0000 From: Arnaud Charlet To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Arnaud Charlet , Jim Blandy , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [Various] obsoleting the annotate level 2 interface Message-ID: <20030129095458.B24931@dublin.int.act-europe.fr> References: <20030128232906.B22772@dublin.int.act-europe.fr> <3E3768D5.1060504@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3E3768D5.1060504@redhat.com>; from ac131313@redhat.com on Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 12:38:29AM -0500 X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00478.txt.bz2 > The proposal is to drop level-two annotation but retain level one > indefinitly. It is level-two that causes all the grief in the code. Thanks for clarifying. Since there were definitely different messages saying different things on this subject, I'm glad this is clarified, and good to hear that annotate 1 is not going to disappear. Arno