* Re: GDB 5.1.92 available
@ 2002-04-26 19:29 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-04-29 1:39 ` GDB 5.1.92 available [patch] Michal Ludvig
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain @ 2002-04-26 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ac131313, gdb, insight
The last-minute x86-64 warning has a typo in it:
printf_filtered
("NOTE: This function doesn't seem to have a valid prologue.\n"
" Try to add -fno-omit-frame-pointer tou your gcc's CFLAGS.\n");
^^^
Michael C
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: GDB 5.1.92 available [patch]
2002-04-26 19:29 GDB 5.1.92 available Michael Elizabeth Chastain
@ 2002-04-29 1:39 ` Michal Ludvig
2002-04-29 10:25 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Michal Ludvig @ 2002-04-29 1:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain; +Cc: ac131313, gdb
Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
> The last-minute x86-64 warning has a typo in it:
>
> printf_filtered
> ("NOTE: This function doesn't seem to have a valid prologue.\n"
> " Try to add -fno-omit-frame-pointer tou your gcc's CFLAGS.\n");
Thanks, fixed.
Index: x86-64-tdep.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/x86-64-tdep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.9.2.2
retrieving revision 1.9.2.3
diff -u -r1.9.2.2 -r1.9.2.3
--- x86-64-tdep.c 27 Apr 2002 00:11:18 -0000 1.9.2.2
+++ x86-64-tdep.c 27 Apr 2002 22:57:23 -0000 1.9.2.3
@@ -822,7 +822,7 @@
{
printf_filtered
("NOTE: This function doesn't seem to have a valid prologue.\n"
- " Try to add -fno-omit-frame-pointer tou your gcc's
CFLAGS.\n");
+ " Consider adding -fno-omit-frame-pointer to your gcc's
CFLAGS.\n");
omit_fp_note_printed++;
}
return pc;
Michal Ludvig
--
* SuSE CR, s.r.o * mludvig@suse.cz
* +420 2 9654 5373 * http://www.suse.cz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: GDB 5.1.92 available [patch]
2002-04-29 1:39 ` GDB 5.1.92 available [patch] Michal Ludvig
@ 2002-04-29 10:25 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-29 11:17 ` Michal Ludvig
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-04-29 10:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Ludvig; +Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain, gdb
> Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
> The last-minute x86-64 warning has a typo in it:
>
> printf_filtered
> ("NOTE: This function doesn't seem to have a valid prologue.\n"
> " Try to add -fno-omit-frame-pointer tou your gcc's CFLAGS.\n");
>
> Thanks, fixed.
>
> Index: x86-64-tdep.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/x86-64-tdep.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.9.2.2
> retrieving revision 1.9.2.3
> diff -u -r1.9.2.2 -r1.9.2.3
> --- x86-64-tdep.c 27 Apr 2002 00:11:18 -0000 1.9.2.2
> +++ x86-64-tdep.c 27 Apr 2002 22:57:23 -0000 1.9.2.3
> @@ -822,7 +822,7 @@
> {
> printf_filtered
> ("NOTE: This function doesn't seem to have a valid prologue.\n"
> - " Try to add -fno-omit-frame-pointer tou your gcc's CFLAGS.\n");
> + " Consider adding -fno-omit-frame-pointer to your gcc's CFLAGS.\n");
> omit_fp_note_printed++;
> }
> return pc;
Oops! I should have been very clear that the 5.2 branch is frozen but I
wasn't :-(.
Anyway, the change won't make it into 5.2. That would mean re-building
the tar-ball and that in turn would mean that people would again have to
re-download and test it.
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: GDB 5.1.92 available [patch]
2002-04-29 10:25 ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2002-04-29 11:17 ` Michal Ludvig
2002-04-29 11:46 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Michal Ludvig @ 2002-04-29 11:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: gdb
Andrew Cagney wrote:
> Oops! I should have been very clear that the 5.2 branch is frozen but I
> wasn't :-(.
Oh, I'm sorry. My fault.
> Anyway, the change won't make it into 5.2. That would mean re-building
> the tar-ball and that in turn would mean that people would again have to
> re-download and test it.
Never mind, this is not an important change.
BTW The branch for 5.2.1 will remain this one or will you create a
different one?
Michal Ludvig
--
* SuSE CR, s.r.o * mludvig@suse.cz
* +420 2 9654 5373 * http://www.suse.cz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: GDB 5.1.92 available [patch]
2002-04-29 11:17 ` Michal Ludvig
@ 2002-04-29 11:46 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-04-29 11:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Ludvig; +Cc: gdb
> Andrew Cagney wrote:
> Oops! I should have been very clear that the 5.2 branch is frozen but I wasn't :-(.
>
> Oh, I'm sorry. My fault.
>
> Anyway, the change won't make it into 5.2. That would mean re-building the tar-ball and that in turn would mean that people would again have to re-download and test it.
>
> Never mind, this is not an important change.
> BTW The branch for 5.2.1 will remain this one or will you create a different one?
Same branch.
I'll update the relevant doco to mention that a very clear/separate
branch frozen message needs to be posted.
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: GDB 5.1.92 available
@ 2002-04-27 5:39 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain @ 2002-04-27 5:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ac131313, gdb, insight
It works for me: native i686-pc-linux-gnu, 5 gcc's, -gdwarf2 and -gstabs+.
Full report over in gdb-testers mailing list as usual.
Michael C
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: GDB 5.1.92 available
@ 2002-04-26 19:18 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain @ 2002-04-26 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ac131313, gdb, insight
Party time!
I'll throw this into my native i686-pc-linux-gnu testbed
and see what happens.
Michael C
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* GDB 5.1.92 available
@ 2002-04-26 19:09 Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-04-26 19:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb, insight
ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/gdb/snapshots/branch/
All is not what it seems ;-)
I'm planning on ``renaming it'' sometime after 12:00 monday gmt.
``break main; run'' works on Red Hat 7.2 i386.
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-04-29 18:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-04-26 19:29 GDB 5.1.92 available Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-04-29 1:39 ` GDB 5.1.92 available [patch] Michal Ludvig
2002-04-29 10:25 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-29 11:17 ` Michal Ludvig
2002-04-29 11:46 ` Andrew Cagney
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-27 5:39 GDB 5.1.92 available Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-04-26 19:18 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-04-26 19:09 Andrew Cagney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox