From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28213 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2002 18:46:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28204 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2002 18:46:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.31.105.161) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Apr 2002 18:46:03 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CF843D6D; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 14:46:02 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3CCD94E9.8030001@cygnus.com> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 11:46:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020424 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michal Ludvig Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB 5.1.92 available [patch] References: <200204270229.g3R2TkN27473@duracef.shout.net> <3CCD06C7.3040007@suse.cz> <3CCD8209.4070407@cygnus.com> <3CCD8E18.4000609@suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00491.txt.bz2 > Andrew Cagney wrote: > Oops! I should have been very clear that the 5.2 branch is frozen but I wasn't :-(. > > Oh, I'm sorry. My fault. > > Anyway, the change won't make it into 5.2. That would mean re-building the tar-ball and that in turn would mean that people would again have to re-download and test it. > > Never mind, this is not an important change. > BTW The branch for 5.2.1 will remain this one or will you create a different one? Same branch. I'll update the relevant doco to mention that a very clear/separate branch frozen message needs to be posted. Andrew