From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-8717-listarch-gdb=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 22416 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2002 17:25:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 22390 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2002 17:25:27 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.31.105.161)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Apr 2002 17:25:27 -0000
Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id DB9CF3D64; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 13:25:29 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <3CCD8209.4070407@cygnus.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 10:25:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020424
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michal Ludvig <mludvig@suse.cz>
Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>,
	gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: GDB 5.1.92 available [patch]
References: <200204270229.g3R2TkN27473@duracef.shout.net> <3CCD06C7.3040007@suse.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00486.txt.bz2

> Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
> The last-minute x86-64 warning has a typo in it:
> 
>   printf_filtered
>    ("NOTE: This function doesn't seem to have a valid prologue.\n"
>     "      Try to add -fno-omit-frame-pointer tou your gcc's CFLAGS.\n");
> 
> Thanks, fixed.
> 
> Index: x86-64-tdep.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/x86-64-tdep.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.9.2.2
> retrieving revision 1.9.2.3
> diff -u -r1.9.2.2 -r1.9.2.3
> --- x86-64-tdep.c       27 Apr 2002 00:11:18 -0000      1.9.2.2
> +++ x86-64-tdep.c       27 Apr 2002 22:57:23 -0000      1.9.2.3
> @@ -822,7 +822,7 @@
>    {
>      printf_filtered
>        ("NOTE: This function doesn't seem to have a valid prologue.\n"
> -       "      Try to add -fno-omit-frame-pointer tou your gcc's CFLAGS.\n");
> +       "      Consider adding -fno-omit-frame-pointer to your gcc's CFLAGS.\n");
>      omit_fp_note_printed++;
>    }
>   return pc;

Oops!  I should have been very clear that the 5.2 branch is frozen but I 
wasn't :-(.

Anyway, the change won't make it into 5.2.  That would mean re-building 
the tar-ball and that in turn would mean that people would again have to 
re-download and test it.

Andrew