* Re: GDB 6.5 branch on Sun May 14th
@ 2006-08-22 9:51 Nick Roberts
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Nick Roberts @ 2006-08-22 9:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Jacobowitz; +Cc: gdb
[Sorry I seem to have lost the original message. It's archived
at http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2006-05/msg00197.html]
> On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 09:22:15AM +1200, Nick Roberts wrote:
> > OK, I had thoght you considered the change to be reasonable. Lets leave it
> > till after the release then, when we can discuss how to print values more
> > fully. As Eli points out, its pretty pointless trying to predict Emacs's
> > release anyway.
> I'll get to it before the release if I can; it's just that GDB builds
> up such a backlog of unreviewed patches that it takes a full day or
> more every time I get started.
Emacs *might* be up for pretest shortly. Can you please review/approve this
change shortly so that I can make the associated changes to Emacs? A statement
that you will allow such a change before the next release (6.6?) of GDB would
be sufficient.
I submitted something for the testsuite earlier:
Re: [PATCH]: MI -var-set-format (Tue, 16 May 2006 14:34:42 +1200)
[http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2006-05/msg00348.html]
--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob
2006-05-02 Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
* mi/mi-cmd-var.c (mi_cmd_var_set_format): Add value field to output.
*** mi-cmd-var.c 31 Mar 2006 12:46:48 +1200 1.23
--- mi-cmd-var.c 02 May 2006 18:16:39 +1200
***************
*** 211,216 ****
--- 211,219 ----
/* Report the new current format */
ui_out_field_string (uiout, "format", varobj_format_string[(int) format]);
+
+ /* Report the value in the new format */
+ ui_out_field_string (uiout, "value", varobj_get_value (var));
return MI_CMD_DONE;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* GDB 6.5 branch on Sun May 14th
@ 2006-05-14 6:57 Joel Brobecker
2006-05-14 7:33 ` Nick Roberts
2006-05-14 16:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2006-05-14 6:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb
Hello,
Now that the last couple of patches I thought were important enough to
delay 6.5 are in, I was thinking that maybe tomorrow would be a good
day to use as the start of the 6.5 branch. Any better suggestion?
Thanks,
--
Joel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: GDB 6.5 branch on Sun May 14th
2006-05-14 6:57 Joel Brobecker
@ 2006-05-14 7:33 ` Nick Roberts
2006-05-14 10:41 ` Joel Brobecker
2006-05-14 21:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-05-14 16:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
1 sibling, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Nick Roberts @ 2006-05-14 7:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joel Brobecker; +Cc: gdb
> Now that the last couple of patches I thought were important enough to
> delay 6.5 are in, I was thinking that maybe tomorrow would be a good
> day to use as the start of the 6.5 branch. Any better suggestion?
Could I sneak in the change to -var-set-format that I submitted earlier?
(reproduced below). There must be a chance that Emacs 22 will be released
before the GDB release after 6.5, and then I'll be up and running.
--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob
2006-05-02 Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
* mi/mi-cmd-var.c (mi_cmd_var_set_format): Add value field to output.
*** mi-cmd-var.c 31 Mar 2006 12:46:48 +1200 1.23
--- mi-cmd-var.c 02 May 2006 18:16:39 +1200
***************
*** 211,216 ****
--- 211,219 ----
/* Report the new current format */
ui_out_field_string (uiout, "format", varobj_format_string[(int) format]);
+
+ /* Report the value in the new format */
+ ui_out_field_string (uiout, "value", varobj_get_value (var));
return MI_CMD_DONE;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: GDB 6.5 branch on Sun May 14th
2006-05-14 7:33 ` Nick Roberts
@ 2006-05-14 10:41 ` Joel Brobecker
2006-05-14 16:03 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-05-14 21:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2006-05-14 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nick Roberts; +Cc: gdb
> > Now that the last couple of patches I thought were important enough to
> > delay 6.5 are in, I was thinking that maybe tomorrow would be a good
> > day to use as the start of the 6.5 branch. Any better suggestion?
>
> Could I sneak in the change to -var-set-format that I submitted earlier?
> (reproduced below). There must be a chance that Emacs 22 will be released
> before the GDB release after 6.5, and then I'll be up and running.
I am not opposed, but remember that you can always port this change
to the branch if the patch is deemed safe enough but is committed
too late.
--
Joel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: GDB 6.5 branch on Sun May 14th
2006-05-14 10:41 ` Joel Brobecker
@ 2006-05-14 16:03 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-05-14 22:38 ` Nick Roberts
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2006-05-14 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joel Brobecker; +Cc: Nick Roberts, gdb
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 11:57:32PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > > Now that the last couple of patches I thought were important enough to
> > > delay 6.5 are in, I was thinking that maybe tomorrow would be a good
> > > day to use as the start of the 6.5 branch. Any better suggestion?
> >
> > Could I sneak in the change to -var-set-format that I submitted earlier?
> > (reproduced below). There must be a chance that Emacs 22 will be released
> > before the GDB release after 6.5, and then I'll be up and running.
>
> I am not opposed, but remember that you can always port this change
> to the branch if the patch is deemed safe enough but is committed
> too late.
Yes, that's a better idea. Nick, I will respond to your questions
when I have another spare day to review GDB patches, but please
remember that I objected to the patch; some of your responses to not
make sense to me.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: GDB 6.5 branch on Sun May 14th
2006-05-14 16:03 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2006-05-14 22:38 ` Nick Roberts
2006-05-14 22:44 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Nick Roberts @ 2006-05-14 22:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Jacobowitz; +Cc: Joel Brobecker, gdb
> > I am not opposed, but remember that you can always port this change
> > to the branch if the patch is deemed safe enough but is committed
> > too late.
>
> Yes, that's a better idea. Nick, I will respond to your questions
> when I have another spare day to review GDB patches, but please
> remember that I objected to the patch; some of your responses to not
> make sense to me.
OK, I had thoght you considered the change to be reasonable. Lets leave it
till after the release then, when we can discuss how to print values more
fully. As Eli points out, its pretty pointless trying to predict Emacs's
release anyway.
--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: GDB 6.5 branch on Sun May 14th
2006-05-14 22:38 ` Nick Roberts
@ 2006-05-14 22:44 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2006-05-14 22:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nick Roberts; +Cc: Joel Brobecker, gdb
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 09:22:15AM +1200, Nick Roberts wrote:
> OK, I had thoght you considered the change to be reasonable. Lets leave it
> till after the release then, when we can discuss how to print values more
> fully. As Eli points out, its pretty pointless trying to predict Emacs's
> release anyway.
I'll get to it before the release if I can; it's just that GDB builds
up such a backlog of unreviewed patches that it takes a full day or
more every time I get started.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: GDB 6.5 branch on Sun May 14th
2006-05-14 7:33 ` Nick Roberts
2006-05-14 10:41 ` Joel Brobecker
@ 2006-05-14 21:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2006-05-14 21:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nick Roberts; +Cc: brobecker, gdb
> From: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
> Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 17:33:58 +1200
> Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
>
> There must be a chance that Emacs 22 will be released before the GDB
> release after 6.5
Keep dreaming... (Not that I'm opposed to get this patch in, if
others don't object).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: GDB 6.5 branch on Sun May 14th
2006-05-14 6:57 Joel Brobecker
2006-05-14 7:33 ` Nick Roberts
@ 2006-05-14 16:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2006-05-14 16:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joel Brobecker; +Cc: gdb
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 10:01:07PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Now that the last couple of patches I thought were important enough to
> delay 6.5 are in, I was thinking that maybe tomorrow would be a good
> day to use as the start of the 6.5 branch. Any better suggestion?
Sounds good to me. I have only one more thing tentatively planned
for 6.5 (renaming qPart:auxv to not conflict with qP) and it's not
heartbreaking if it doesn't get done.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-08-22 9:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-08-22 9:51 GDB 6.5 branch on Sun May 14th Nick Roberts
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-05-14 6:57 Joel Brobecker
2006-05-14 7:33 ` Nick Roberts
2006-05-14 10:41 ` Joel Brobecker
2006-05-14 16:03 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-05-14 22:38 ` Nick Roberts
2006-05-14 22:44 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-05-14 21:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-05-14 16:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox