From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5543 invoked by alias); 14 May 2006 21:22:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 5530 invoked by uid 22791); 14 May 2006 21:22:38 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from viper.snap.net.nz (HELO viper.snap.net.nz) (202.37.101.8) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 14 May 2006 21:22:32 +0000 Received: from kahikatea.snap.net.nz (p202-124-112-217.snap.net.nz [202.124.112.217]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1513F7576DF; Mon, 15 May 2006 09:22:31 +1200 (NZST) Received: by kahikatea.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 500) id 794C91D3550; Tue, 16 May 2006 09:22:17 +1200 (NZST) From: Nick Roberts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17512.61703.762754.414587@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 22:38:00 -0000 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Joel Brobecker , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB 6.5 branch on Sun May 14th In-Reply-To: <20060514150621.GA29251@nevyn.them.org> References: <20060514050107.GA6718@adacore.com> <17510.49478.586246.146949@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <20060514065732.GC6718@adacore.com> <20060514150621.GA29251@nevyn.them.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.0.50.12 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00198.txt.bz2 > > I am not opposed, but remember that you can always port this change > > to the branch if the patch is deemed safe enough but is committed > > too late. > > Yes, that's a better idea. Nick, I will respond to your questions > when I have another spare day to review GDB patches, but please > remember that I objected to the patch; some of your responses to not > make sense to me. OK, I had thoght you considered the change to be reasonable. Lets leave it till after the release then, when we can discuss how to print values more fully. As Eli points out, its pretty pointless trying to predict Emacs's release anyway. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob