From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31065 invoked by alias); 14 May 2006 15:06:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 31057 invoked by uid 22791); 14 May 2006 15:06:29 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Sun, 14 May 2006 15:06:27 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1FfIAn-0007cg-3f; Sun, 14 May 2006 11:06:21 -0400 Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 16:03:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Nick Roberts , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB 6.5 branch on Sun May 14th Message-ID: <20060514150621.GA29251@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joel Brobecker , Nick Roberts , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <20060514050107.GA6718@adacore.com> <17510.49478.586246.146949@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <20060514065732.GC6718@adacore.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060514065732.GC6718@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00193.txt.bz2 On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 11:57:32PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > > Now that the last couple of patches I thought were important enough to > > > delay 6.5 are in, I was thinking that maybe tomorrow would be a good > > > day to use as the start of the 6.5 branch. Any better suggestion? > > > > Could I sneak in the change to -var-set-format that I submitted earlier? > > (reproduced below). There must be a chance that Emacs 22 will be released > > before the GDB release after 6.5, and then I'll be up and running. > > I am not opposed, but remember that you can always port this change > to the branch if the patch is deemed safe enough but is committed > too late. Yes, that's a better idea. Nick, I will respond to your questions when I have another spare day to review GDB patches, but please remember that I objected to the patch; some of your responses to not make sense to me. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery