From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11921 invoked by alias); 22 Aug 2006 09:51:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 11913 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Aug 2006 09:51:09 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from viper.snap.net.nz (HELO viper.snap.net.nz) (202.37.101.8) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:51:02 +0000 Received: from kahikatea.snap.net.nz (p202-124-124-77.snap.net.nz [202.124.124.77]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CC727B4DBA for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 21:50:58 +1200 (NZST) Received: by kahikatea.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 500) id C85D7BE43B; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 21:48:56 +1200 (NZST) From: Nick Roberts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17642.54022.85553.621530@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:51:00 -0000 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB 6.5 branch on Sun May 14th X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.0.50.4 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-08/txt/msg00179.txt.bz2 [Sorry I seem to have lost the original message. It's archived at http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2006-05/msg00197.html] > On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 09:22:15AM +1200, Nick Roberts wrote: > > OK, I had thoght you considered the change to be reasonable. Lets leave it > > till after the release then, when we can discuss how to print values more > > fully. As Eli points out, its pretty pointless trying to predict Emacs's > > release anyway. > I'll get to it before the release if I can; it's just that GDB builds > up such a backlog of unreviewed patches that it takes a full day or > more every time I get started. Emacs *might* be up for pretest shortly. Can you please review/approve this change shortly so that I can make the associated changes to Emacs? A statement that you will allow such a change before the next release (6.6?) of GDB would be sufficient. I submitted something for the testsuite earlier: Re: [PATCH]: MI -var-set-format (Tue, 16 May 2006 14:34:42 +1200) [http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2006-05/msg00348.html] -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob 2006-05-02 Nick Roberts * mi/mi-cmd-var.c (mi_cmd_var_set_format): Add value field to output. *** mi-cmd-var.c 31 Mar 2006 12:46:48 +1200 1.23 --- mi-cmd-var.c 02 May 2006 18:16:39 +1200 *************** *** 211,216 **** --- 211,219 ---- /* Report the new current format */ ui_out_field_string (uiout, "format", varobj_format_string[(int) format]); + + /* Report the value in the new format */ + ui_out_field_string (uiout, "value", varobj_get_value (var)); return MI_CMD_DONE; }