Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Namespace testcases
@ 2002-11-08 10:38 Elena Zannoni
  2002-11-08 11:09 ` David Carlton
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Elena Zannoni @ 2002-11-08 10:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: carlton, drow; +Cc: gdb


David, Daniel

What do you think of pushing the namespaces.exp additions to mainline
gdb?  I would like to mark the failures with kfail and open
corresponding gnats PRs. 

So we can really know where we are....and have the satisfaction of
telling people reporting problems: "yeah, known bug, see PR/1234".

Elena



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Namespace testcases
  2002-11-08 10:38 Namespace testcases Elena Zannoni
@ 2002-11-08 11:09 ` David Carlton
  2002-11-15 15:37   ` David Carlton
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Carlton @ 2002-11-08 11:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Elena Zannoni; +Cc: drow, gdb

On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 13:34:35 -0500, Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com> said:

> David, Daniel

> What do you think of pushing the namespaces.exp additions to mainline
> gdb?  I would like to mark the failures with kfail and open
> corresponding gnats PRs. 

That sounds reasonable to me.  I've got several testcases involving
namespace scope issues, anonymous namespaces, namespace aliases, and
using declarations; I can post an RFA for them on the mainline as soon
as there are PR's for them.  I'll put adding PR's on my To Do list.

Maybe Daniel could come up with some test cases/PR's involving the
fact that GDB doesn't know what namespaces types are defined in.

> So we can really know where we are....and have the satisfaction of
> telling people reporting problems: "yeah, known bug, see PR/1234".

Good point.

David Carlton
carlton@math.stanford.edu


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Namespace testcases
  2002-11-08 11:09 ` David Carlton
@ 2002-11-15 15:37   ` David Carlton
  2002-11-15 17:23     ` Elena Zannoni
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Carlton @ 2002-11-15 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Elena Zannoni; +Cc: drow, gdb

On 08 Nov 2002 11:08:47 -0800, David Carlton <carlton@math.Stanford.EDU> said:
> On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 13:34:35 -0500, Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com> said:

>> What do you think of pushing the namespaces.exp additions to mainline
>> gdb?  I would like to mark the failures with kfail and open
>> corresponding gnats PRs. 

> That sounds reasonable to me.  I've got several testcases involving
> namespace scope issues, anonymous namespaces, namespace aliases, and
> using declarations; I can post an RFA for them on the mainline as soon
> as there are PR's for them.  I'll put adding PR's on my To Do list.

> Maybe Daniel could come up with some test cases/PR's involving the
> fact that GDB doesn't know what namespaces types are defined in.

I've filed PR's for everything that comes to mind.  I probably missed
a few subtleties, but it's a start.  Hopefully next week I'll be able
to find some time to clean up the testcases that I currently have on
the branch and file a mainline RFA for them.

>> So we can really know where we are....and have the satisfaction of
>> telling people reporting problems: "yeah, known bug, see PR/1234".

Not only can we tell people that, we can blame everything on GCC. :-)

David Carlton
carlton@math.stanford.edu


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Namespace testcases
  2002-11-15 15:37   ` David Carlton
@ 2002-11-15 17:23     ` Elena Zannoni
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Elena Zannoni @ 2002-11-15 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Carlton; +Cc: Elena Zannoni, drow, gdb

David Carlton writes:
 > On 08 Nov 2002 11:08:47 -0800, David Carlton <carlton@math.Stanford.EDU> said:
 > > On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 13:34:35 -0500, Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com> said:
 > 
 > >> What do you think of pushing the namespaces.exp additions to mainline
 > >> gdb?  I would like to mark the failures with kfail and open
 > >> corresponding gnats PRs. 
 > 
 > > That sounds reasonable to me.  I've got several testcases involving
 > > namespace scope issues, anonymous namespaces, namespace aliases, and
 > > using declarations; I can post an RFA for them on the mainline as soon
 > > as there are PR's for them.  I'll put adding PR's on my To Do list.
 > 
 > > Maybe Daniel could come up with some test cases/PR's involving the
 > > fact that GDB doesn't know what namespaces types are defined in.
 > 
 > I've filed PR's for everything that comes to mind.  I probably missed
 > a few subtleties, but it's a start.  Hopefully next week I'll be able
 > to find some time to clean up the testcases that I currently have on
 > the branch and file a mainline RFA for them.

This is great. thanks for doing it!

 > 
 > >> So we can really know where we are....and have the satisfaction of
 > >> telling people reporting problems: "yeah, known bug, see PR/1234".
 > 
 > Not only can we tell people that, we can blame everything on GCC. :-)
 > 

he he he... that's the plan! :-) 
Seriously, maybe now we can start pushing a bit on them.

Elena

 > David Carlton
 > carlton@math.stanford.edu


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-11-16  1:23 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-11-08 10:38 Namespace testcases Elena Zannoni
2002-11-08 11:09 ` David Carlton
2002-11-15 15:37   ` David Carlton
2002-11-15 17:23     ` Elena Zannoni

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox