From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13850 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2002 01:23:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13843 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2002 01:23:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Nov 2002 01:23:04 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAG0xbw28519 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 19:59:37 -0500 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAG1N3D23174 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 20:23:03 -0500 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (romulus-int.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.46]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAG1Lfq13430; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 20:23:02 -0500 Received: by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 469) id 19DD5FF7D; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 20:16:11 -0500 (EST) From: Elena Zannoni MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15829.40026.944264.755161@localhost.redhat.com> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 17:23:00 -0000 To: David Carlton Cc: Elena Zannoni , drow@mvista.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Namespace testcases In-Reply-To: References: <15820.955.298365.596760@localhost.redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00188.txt.bz2 David Carlton writes: > On 08 Nov 2002 11:08:47 -0800, David Carlton said: > > On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 13:34:35 -0500, Elena Zannoni said: > > >> What do you think of pushing the namespaces.exp additions to mainline > >> gdb? I would like to mark the failures with kfail and open > >> corresponding gnats PRs. > > > That sounds reasonable to me. I've got several testcases involving > > namespace scope issues, anonymous namespaces, namespace aliases, and > > using declarations; I can post an RFA for them on the mainline as soon > > as there are PR's for them. I'll put adding PR's on my To Do list. > > > Maybe Daniel could come up with some test cases/PR's involving the > > fact that GDB doesn't know what namespaces types are defined in. > > I've filed PR's for everything that comes to mind. I probably missed > a few subtleties, but it's a start. Hopefully next week I'll be able > to find some time to clean up the testcases that I currently have on > the branch and file a mainline RFA for them. This is great. thanks for doing it! > > >> So we can really know where we are....and have the satisfaction of > >> telling people reporting problems: "yeah, known bug, see PR/1234". > > Not only can we tell people that, we can blame everything on GCC. :-) > he he he... that's the plan! :-) Seriously, maybe now we can start pushing a bit on them. Elena > David Carlton > carlton@math.stanford.edu