From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23109 invoked by alias); 8 Nov 2002 19:09:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23096 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2002 19:08:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jackfruit.Stanford.EDU) (171.64.38.136) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Nov 2002 19:08:57 -0000 Received: (from carlton@localhost) by jackfruit.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gA8J8mr31208; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 11:08:48 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: jackfruit.Stanford.EDU: carlton set sender to carlton@math.stanford.edu using -f To: Elena Zannoni Cc: drow@mvista.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Namespace testcases References: <15820.955.298365.596760@localhost.redhat.com> From: David Carlton Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 11:09:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <15820.955.298365.596760@localhost.redhat.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00089.txt.bz2 On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 13:34:35 -0500, Elena Zannoni said: > David, Daniel > What do you think of pushing the namespaces.exp additions to mainline > gdb? I would like to mark the failures with kfail and open > corresponding gnats PRs. That sounds reasonable to me. I've got several testcases involving namespace scope issues, anonymous namespaces, namespace aliases, and using declarations; I can post an RFA for them on the mainline as soon as there are PR's for them. I'll put adding PR's on my To Do list. Maybe Daniel could come up with some test cases/PR's involving the fact that GDB doesn't know what namespaces types are defined in. > So we can really know where we are....and have the satisfaction of > telling people reporting problems: "yeah, known bug, see PR/1234". Good point. David Carlton carlton@math.stanford.edu