From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2308 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2002 23:37:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2296 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2002 23:37:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jackfruit.Stanford.EDU) (171.64.38.136) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Nov 2002 23:37:45 -0000 Received: (from carlton@localhost) by jackfruit.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gAFNbXL13611; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:37:33 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: jackfruit.Stanford.EDU: carlton set sender to carlton@math.stanford.edu using -f To: Elena Zannoni Cc: drow@mvista.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Namespace testcases References: <15820.955.298365.596760@localhost.redhat.com> From: David Carlton Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:37:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00186.txt.bz2 On 08 Nov 2002 11:08:47 -0800, David Carlton said: > On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 13:34:35 -0500, Elena Zannoni said: >> What do you think of pushing the namespaces.exp additions to mainline >> gdb? I would like to mark the failures with kfail and open >> corresponding gnats PRs. > That sounds reasonable to me. I've got several testcases involving > namespace scope issues, anonymous namespaces, namespace aliases, and > using declarations; I can post an RFA for them on the mainline as soon > as there are PR's for them. I'll put adding PR's on my To Do list. > Maybe Daniel could come up with some test cases/PR's involving the > fact that GDB doesn't know what namespaces types are defined in. I've filed PR's for everything that comes to mind. I probably missed a few subtleties, but it's a start. Hopefully next week I'll be able to find some time to clean up the testcases that I currently have on the branch and file a mainline RFA for them. >> So we can really know where we are....and have the satisfaction of >> telling people reporting problems: "yeah, known bug, see PR/1234". Not only can we tell people that, we can blame everything on GCC. :-) David Carlton carlton@math.stanford.edu