Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Cc: andrew.stubbs@st.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't give spurious warnings when using thread specific breakpoints
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 04:17:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <uirihq6qr.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jed58pcr53.fsf@sykes.suse.de> (message from Andreas Schwab on 	Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:20:40 +0200)

> From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
> Cc: Andrew STUBBS <andrew.stubbs@st.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:20:40 +0200
> >
> >    ALL_BREAKPOINTS (b)
> >      if (b->loc->address == pc)	/* address match / overlay match */
> > 	if (!b->pending && (!overlay_debugging || b->loc->section == section))
> > 	  {
> > 	    others--;
> > 	    if (others == 1 &&
> > 	       (b->enable_state == bp_disabled || 
> > 	        b->enable_state == bp_shlib_disabled || 
> > 	        b->enable_state == bp_call_disabled))
> > 	       printf_filtered (_("Note: breakpoint %d (disabled) also set at pc "),
> 
> That won't work either.  Some languages (notably German) need to put the
> verb at the end of the sentence in such a case.

Yes, for better results the following call to
deprecated_print_address_numeric should be made a part of the message
(as a format specifier, for example, or concatenated string).


  reply	other threads:[~2006-10-19  4:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-11 13:44 Andrew STUBBS
2006-10-11 13:55 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-11 14:46   ` Andrew STUBBS
2006-10-11 20:45     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-11 22:12       ` Mark Kettenis
2006-10-11 22:14       ` Joel Brobecker
2006-10-18 12:01       ` Andrew STUBBS
2006-10-18 14:14         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-18 15:12           ` Andrew STUBBS
2006-10-18 19:47             ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-10-18 20:21               ` Andreas Schwab
2006-10-19  4:17                 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2006-10-19  9:47               ` Andrew STUBBS
2006-10-20  6:10                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-10-20 14:29                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-20 17:42                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-10-20 17:47                       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-20 18:03                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-10-20 18:07                           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-20 18:11                             ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-10-19 13:28             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-19 15:59               ` Andrew STUBBS
2006-10-18 19:22           ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-10-11 22:06   ` Mark Kettenis
2006-10-12 10:45     ` Andrew STUBBS

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=uirihq6qr.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=andrew.stubbs@st.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=schwab@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox