From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: drow@false.org
Cc: andrew.stubbs@st.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't give spurious warnings when using thread specific breakpoints
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 22:06:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200610112206.k9BM68ml030875@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061011135545.GA26060@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Wed, 11 Oct 2006 09:55:45 -0400)
> Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 09:55:45 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
>
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 02:44:20PM +0100, Andrew STUBBS wrote:
> > When creating a thread specific breakpoint GDB will warn about other
> > breakpoints set on the same address even when they are specific to
> > another thread.
> >
> > The attached patch prevents it warning about breakpoints from other
> > threads. When a non-thread specific breakpoint is created, or already
> > exists, the warning is still given, but is annotated with the thread
> > information. When not using thread specific breakpoints the behaviour
> > should remain unaltered.
>
> (gdb) b main if 1
> Breakpoint 1 at 0x439ee0
> (gdb) b main if 2
> Note: breakpoint 1 also set at pc 0x439ee0.
> Breakpoint 2 at 0x439ee0
>
> If that's right, why is similar for threads wrong? That's just a
> different condition. And the wording is such that it's perfectly
> correct.
I don't see the problem either.
Mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-11 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-11 13:44 Andrew STUBBS
2006-10-11 13:55 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-11 14:46 ` Andrew STUBBS
2006-10-11 20:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-11 22:12 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-10-11 22:14 ` Joel Brobecker
2006-10-18 12:01 ` Andrew STUBBS
2006-10-18 14:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-18 15:12 ` Andrew STUBBS
2006-10-18 19:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-10-18 20:21 ` Andreas Schwab
2006-10-19 4:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-10-19 9:47 ` Andrew STUBBS
2006-10-20 6:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-10-20 14:29 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-20 17:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-10-20 17:47 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-20 18:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-10-20 18:07 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-20 18:11 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-10-19 13:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-19 15:59 ` Andrew STUBBS
2006-10-18 19:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-10-11 22:06 ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2006-10-12 10:45 ` Andrew STUBBS
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200610112206.k9BM68ml030875@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl \
--to=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
--cc=andrew.stubbs@st.com \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox