From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't give spurious warnings when using thread specific breakpoints
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 22:14:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061011221401.GF1059@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061011204525.GA9622@nevyn.them.org>
> > It's also easy to tell that the thread is different, while comparing
> > conditions makes no sense (although checking for the presence of
> > conditions might).
>
> This does make a little sense to me. Anyone think there's value in keeping
> the note for breakpoints in different threads?
I don't really mind either way. I don't personnaly find the current
wording as irritating, and none of our customers have ever complained
about it yet, but it sounds easy to support, so why not. The note
is still pretty short despite the addition.
--
Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-11 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-11 13:44 Andrew STUBBS
2006-10-11 13:55 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-11 14:46 ` Andrew STUBBS
2006-10-11 20:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-11 22:12 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-10-11 22:14 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2006-10-18 12:01 ` Andrew STUBBS
2006-10-18 14:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-18 15:12 ` Andrew STUBBS
2006-10-18 19:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-10-18 20:21 ` Andreas Schwab
2006-10-19 4:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-10-19 9:47 ` Andrew STUBBS
2006-10-20 6:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-10-20 14:29 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-20 17:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-10-20 17:47 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-20 18:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-10-20 18:07 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-20 18:11 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-10-19 13:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-19 15:59 ` Andrew STUBBS
2006-10-18 19:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-10-11 22:06 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-10-12 10:45 ` Andrew STUBBS
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061011221401.GF1059@adacore.com \
--to=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox