* PATCH: check for `inline' keyword
@ 2002-04-03 16:11 Jim Blandy
2002-04-03 20:36 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jim Blandy @ 2002-04-03 16:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
This allows GDB to use the `inline' keyword, but still build under
compilers that don't support it.
2002-04-03 Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
* configure.in: Call AC_C_INLINE.
* configure: Regenerated.
Index: gdb/configure.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/configure.in,v
retrieving revision 1.84
diff -c -r1.84 configure.in
*** gdb/configure.in 2002/03/15 00:44:49 1.84
--- gdb/configure.in 2002/04/04 00:10:02
***************
*** 130,135 ****
--- 130,136 ----
AC_HEADER_STAT
AC_C_CONST
+ AC_C_INLINE
AC_CHECK_FUNCS(bcopy btowc bzero canonicalize_file_name isascii poll \
realpath sbrk setpgid setpgrp sigaction sigprocmask sigsetmask )
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: PATCH: check for `inline' keyword
2002-04-03 16:11 PATCH: check for `inline' keyword Jim Blandy
@ 2002-04-03 20:36 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-04 13:12 ` Jim Blandy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-04-03 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jim Blandy; +Cc: gdb-patches
> This allows GDB to use the `inline' keyword, but still build under
> compilers that don't support it.
Um, I'm curious. On which machine? Why does GDB want to use the inline
keyword?
Andrew
> 2002-04-03 Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
>
> * configure.in: Call AC_C_INLINE.
> * configure: Regenerated.
>
> Index: gdb/configure.in
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/configure.in,v
> retrieving revision 1.84
> diff -c -r1.84 configure.in
> *** gdb/configure.in 2002/03/15 00:44:49 1.84
> --- gdb/configure.in 2002/04/04 00:10:02
> ***************
> *** 130,135 ****
> --- 130,136 ----
> AC_HEADER_STAT
>
> AC_C_CONST
> + AC_C_INLINE
>
> AC_CHECK_FUNCS(bcopy btowc bzero canonicalize_file_name isascii poll \
> realpath sbrk setpgid setpgrp sigaction sigprocmask sigsetmask )
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: PATCH: check for `inline' keyword
2002-04-03 20:36 ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2002-04-04 13:12 ` Jim Blandy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jim Blandy @ 2002-04-04 13:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: gdb-patches
Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com> writes:
> > This allows GDB to use the `inline' keyword, but still build under
> > compilers that don't support it.
>
> Um, I'm curious. On which machine? Why does GDB want to use the
> inline keyword?
The test works by trying to compile a function with the inline
keyword, and seeing if any errors are reported. So it should work for
any compiler, on any machine.
The macro code has some uses of `inline'. They're not too important.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-04-04 21:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-04-03 16:11 PATCH: check for `inline' keyword Jim Blandy
2002-04-03 20:36 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-04 13:12 ` Jim Blandy
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox