From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-13907-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 27247 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2002 21:12:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 27235 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2002 21:12:27 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO zwingli.cygnus.com) (208.245.165.35)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Apr 2002 21:12:27 -0000
Received: by zwingli.cygnus.com (Postfix, from userid 442)
	id 0D6E85EA11; Thu,  4 Apr 2002 16:12:13 -0500 (EST)
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: PATCH: check for `inline' keyword
References: <20020404001137.979665EA11@zwingli.cygnus.com>
	<3CABD852.5000504@cygnus.com>
From: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 13:12:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <3CABD852.5000504@cygnus.com>
Message-ID: <npwuvnb236.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00128.txt.bz2


Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com> writes:
> > This allows GDB to use the `inline' keyword, but still build under
> > compilers that don't support it.
> 
> Um, I'm curious.  On which machine?  Why does GDB want to use the
> inline keyword?

The test works by trying to compile a function with the inline
keyword, and seeing if any errors are reported.  So it should work for
any compiler, on any machine.

The macro code has some uses of `inline'.  They're not too important.