From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10759 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2002 04:36:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10747 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2002 04:36:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.112.240.27) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Apr 2002 04:36:40 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0EF03E5D; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 23:36:34 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3CABD852.5000504@cygnus.com> Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 20:36:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020328 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Blandy Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: PATCH: check for `inline' keyword References: <20020404001137.979665EA11@zwingli.cygnus.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00097.txt.bz2 > This allows GDB to use the `inline' keyword, but still build under > compilers that don't support it. Um, I'm curious. On which machine? Why does GDB want to use the inline keyword? Andrew > 2002-04-03 Jim Blandy > > * configure.in: Call AC_C_INLINE. > * configure: Regenerated. > > Index: gdb/configure.in > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/configure.in,v > retrieving revision 1.84 > diff -c -r1.84 configure.in > *** gdb/configure.in 2002/03/15 00:44:49 1.84 > --- gdb/configure.in 2002/04/04 00:10:02 > *************** > *** 130,135 **** > --- 130,136 ---- > AC_HEADER_STAT > > AC_C_CONST > + AC_C_INLINE > > AC_CHECK_FUNCS(bcopy btowc bzero canonicalize_file_name isascii poll \ > realpath sbrk setpgid setpgrp sigaction sigprocmask sigsetmask ) >