From: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: PATCH: check for `inline' keyword
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 13:12:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <npwuvnb236.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3CABD852.5000504@cygnus.com>
Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com> writes:
> > This allows GDB to use the `inline' keyword, but still build under
> > compilers that don't support it.
>
> Um, I'm curious. On which machine? Why does GDB want to use the
> inline keyword?
The test works by trying to compile a function with the inline
keyword, and seeing if any errors are reported. So it should work for
any compiler, on any machine.
The macro code has some uses of `inline'. They're not too important.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-04 21:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-03 16:11 Jim Blandy
2002-04-03 20:36 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-04 13:12 ` Jim Blandy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=npwuvnb236.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com \
--to=jimb@redhat.com \
--cc=ac131313@cygnus.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox