Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Clifton <nickc@cambridge.redhat.com>
To: thorpej@wasabisystems.com
Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFA] Include sh64 support for shle-*-netbsdelf*
Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 10:35:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3lmaokl2u.fsf@north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020513082324.R3435@dr-evil.shagadelic.org>

Hi Jason,

>  > > +  shle-*-netbsdelf*)
>  > > +    targ_defvec=bfd_elf32_shlnbsd_vec
>  > > +    targ_selvecs="bfd_elf32_shnbsd_vec shcoff_vec shlcoff_vec"
>  > > +#ifdef BFD64
>  > > +    targ_selvecs="${targ_selvecs} bfd_elf32_sh64_vec bfd_elf32_sh64l_vec bfd_elf64_sh64_vec bfd_elf64_sh64l_vec"
>  > > +#endif
>  > > +    ;;
>  > >    sh*le-*-netbsdelf*)
>  > >      targ_defvec=bfd_elf32_shlnbsd_vec
>  > >      targ_selvecs="bfd_elf32_shnbsd_vec shcoff_vec shlcoff_vec"
>  > 
>  > Doesn't the "sh*le-*-netbsdelf*" target (immediately below the lines
>  > you have added) already cover this situation ?
> 
> It appears as if the intent in other configurations was to include sh64
> support only if the target was "sh", not "sh3" or "sh4", etc.  Look down
> one and two more, and you see the sh-*-netbsdelf* (added by hp when the
> sh64 code went in) and the sh*-*-netbsdelf* (added by me when I checked
> in NetBSD SH support) configs.

Oh right, I understand now.  In which case please consider this part
of the patch approved too.

Cheers
        Nick


  reply	other threads:[~2002-05-13 17:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-05-11 11:56 Jason R Thorpe
2002-05-13  1:48 ` Nick Clifton
2002-05-13  8:23   ` Jason R Thorpe
2002-05-13 10:35     ` Nick Clifton [this message]
2002-05-13 15:13       ` Elena Zannoni
2002-05-13 14:28         ` Jason R Thorpe
2002-05-13 15:13           ` Elena Zannoni
2002-05-14  1:50         ` Nick Clifton
2002-05-14  6:51           ` Elena Zannoni
2002-05-14  7:27             ` Nick Clifton
2002-05-14  8:17               ` Elena Zannoni
     [not found]                 ` <m3offha19r.fsf@north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com>
     [not found]                   ` <3CE2B34F.EAAEF3F8@superh.com>
     [not found]                     ` <15587.63152.235989.94659@localhost.redhat.com>
2002-05-17  5:40                       ` print_insn_sh cleanup Joern Rennecke
2002-05-17  6:54                         ` Elena Zannoni
2002-05-17  7:39                           ` Joern Rennecke
2002-05-20  4:22                             ` Alexandre Oliva
2002-05-20  6:29                               ` Joern Rennecke
2002-05-20  6:57                                 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2002-05-14  8:20               ` [PATCH/RFA] Include sh64 support for shle-*-netbsdelf* Alexandre Oliva
2002-05-14  8:38                 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-05-14  8:46                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m3lmaokl2u.fsf@north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com \
    --to=nickc@cambridge.redhat.com \
    --cc=binutils@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=thorpej@wasabisystems.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox