From: Nick Clifton <nickc@cambridge.redhat.com>
To: thorpej@wasabisystems.com
Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFA] Include sh64 support for shle-*-netbsdelf*
Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 10:35:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3lmaokl2u.fsf@north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020513082324.R3435@dr-evil.shagadelic.org>
Hi Jason,
> > > + shle-*-netbsdelf*)
> > > + targ_defvec=bfd_elf32_shlnbsd_vec
> > > + targ_selvecs="bfd_elf32_shnbsd_vec shcoff_vec shlcoff_vec"
> > > +#ifdef BFD64
> > > + targ_selvecs="${targ_selvecs} bfd_elf32_sh64_vec bfd_elf32_sh64l_vec bfd_elf64_sh64_vec bfd_elf64_sh64l_vec"
> > > +#endif
> > > + ;;
> > > sh*le-*-netbsdelf*)
> > > targ_defvec=bfd_elf32_shlnbsd_vec
> > > targ_selvecs="bfd_elf32_shnbsd_vec shcoff_vec shlcoff_vec"
> >
> > Doesn't the "sh*le-*-netbsdelf*" target (immediately below the lines
> > you have added) already cover this situation ?
>
> It appears as if the intent in other configurations was to include sh64
> support only if the target was "sh", not "sh3" or "sh4", etc. Look down
> one and two more, and you see the sh-*-netbsdelf* (added by hp when the
> sh64 code went in) and the sh*-*-netbsdelf* (added by me when I checked
> in NetBSD SH support) configs.
Oh right, I understand now. In which case please consider this part
of the patch approved too.
Cheers
Nick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-13 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-11 11:56 Jason R Thorpe
2002-05-13 1:48 ` Nick Clifton
2002-05-13 8:23 ` Jason R Thorpe
2002-05-13 10:35 ` Nick Clifton [this message]
2002-05-13 15:13 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-05-13 14:28 ` Jason R Thorpe
2002-05-13 15:13 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-05-14 1:50 ` Nick Clifton
2002-05-14 6:51 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-05-14 7:27 ` Nick Clifton
2002-05-14 8:17 ` Elena Zannoni
[not found] ` <m3offha19r.fsf@north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com>
[not found] ` <3CE2B34F.EAAEF3F8@superh.com>
[not found] ` <15587.63152.235989.94659@localhost.redhat.com>
2002-05-17 5:40 ` print_insn_sh cleanup Joern Rennecke
2002-05-17 6:54 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-05-17 7:39 ` Joern Rennecke
2002-05-20 4:22 ` Alexandre Oliva
2002-05-20 6:29 ` Joern Rennecke
2002-05-20 6:57 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2002-05-14 8:20 ` [PATCH/RFA] Include sh64 support for shle-*-netbsdelf* Alexandre Oliva
2002-05-14 8:38 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-05-14 8:46 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3lmaokl2u.fsf@north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com \
--to=nickc@cambridge.redhat.com \
--cc=binutils@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=thorpej@wasabisystems.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox