From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com>
To: Joern Rennecke <joern.rennecke@superh.com>
Cc: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>,
Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>,
<gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>, <binutils@sources.redhat.com>,
Nick Clifton <nickc@cambridge.redhat.com>,
<thorpej@wasabisystems.com>
Subject: Re: print_insn_sh cleanup
Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 06:57:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.30.0205200954070.771-100000@dair.pair.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3CE8FA6C.2B7B54CC@superh.com>
On Mon, 20 May 2002, Joern Rennecke wrote:
> Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> > Did you run check in binutils too? It's badly hosed at the moment;
> > all SH64 tests in a sh64-elf build with --target_board=sh-hms-sim fail
> > because the disassembler is printing SHmedia instructions as if they
> > were SHcompact.
>
> I get expected passes: 25 and untested testcases: 7.
Those numbers seems like you interpreted binutils as binutils,
:-) not "a build tree for binutils, including subpackages gas,
binutils and ld". BTW, I think you can ignore the test option
RUNTESTFLAGS=--target_board=sh-hms-sim option in this case, if
it confuses you.
brgds, H-P
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-20 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-11 11:56 [PATCH/RFA] Include sh64 support for shle-*-netbsdelf* Jason R Thorpe
2002-05-13 1:48 ` Nick Clifton
2002-05-13 8:23 ` Jason R Thorpe
2002-05-13 10:35 ` Nick Clifton
2002-05-13 15:13 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-05-13 14:28 ` Jason R Thorpe
2002-05-13 15:13 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-05-14 1:50 ` Nick Clifton
2002-05-14 6:51 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-05-14 7:27 ` Nick Clifton
2002-05-14 8:17 ` Elena Zannoni
[not found] ` <m3offha19r.fsf@north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com>
[not found] ` <3CE2B34F.EAAEF3F8@superh.com>
[not found] ` <15587.63152.235989.94659@localhost.redhat.com>
2002-05-17 5:40 ` print_insn_sh cleanup Joern Rennecke
2002-05-17 6:54 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-05-17 7:39 ` Joern Rennecke
2002-05-20 4:22 ` Alexandre Oliva
2002-05-20 6:29 ` Joern Rennecke
2002-05-20 6:57 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson [this message]
2002-05-14 8:20 ` [PATCH/RFA] Include sh64 support for shle-*-netbsdelf* Alexandre Oliva
2002-05-14 8:38 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-05-14 8:46 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.BSF.4.30.0205200954070.771-100000@dair.pair.com \
--to=hp@bitrange.com \
--cc=aoliva@redhat.com \
--cc=binutils@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=ezannoni@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=joern.rennecke@superh.com \
--cc=nickc@cambridge.redhat.com \
--cc=thorpej@wasabisystems.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox