From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@ericsson.com>
Cc: "'Pedro Alves'" <palves@redhat.com>,
"'gdb-patches\@sourceware.org'"
<gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [4/4] RFC: implement catch load and catch unload
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:25:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m38vkxc8ak.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F7CE05678329534C957159168FA70DEC578E892002@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se> (Marc Khouzam's message of "Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:22:30 -0500")
>>>>> "Marc" == Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@ericsson.com> writes:
Marc> Not having this command won't prevent CDI from debugging,
Marc> but will have two impacts, as far as I know:
Marc> 1- no more user feature to stop on lib events
Marc> 2- breakpoints set on non-loaded libs will no longer be
Marc> installed (since CDI does not use pending breakpoints, but
Marc> tries to plant failed bps at each new lib load event)
Just to be clear -- the command still exists and works.
What changed is how gdb reports it. It used to be that you would get:
-exec-continue
~"Stopped due to shared library event."
*stopped
Now you will get:
-exec-continue
*stopped,reason="solib-event",[more stuff]
I can even restore the old output if you really need it; though I'd
prefer we just keep on with a more purely MI solution.
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-24 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-19 21:03 Tom Tromey
2012-01-19 22:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-01-20 15:12 ` Tom Tromey
2012-01-20 17:40 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-24 17:31 ` Tom Tromey
2012-01-24 19:40 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-20 17:44 ` Yao Qi
2012-01-20 19:45 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-24 17:07 ` Tom Tromey
2012-01-24 17:28 ` Marc Khouzam
2012-01-24 18:25 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2012-01-24 18:32 ` Marc Khouzam
2012-01-24 19:15 ` Tom Tromey
2012-01-24 20:36 ` Marc Khouzam
2012-01-24 17:22 ` Tom Tromey
2012-01-24 19:17 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-24 22:11 ` Tom Tromey
2012-01-25 11:06 ` Regression for gdb.mi/mi-nsmoribund.exp [Re: [4/4] RFC: implement catch load and catch unload] Jan Kratochvil
2012-01-25 11:18 ` Regression for gdb.base/solib-disc.exp [Re: Regression for gdb.mi/mi-nsmoribund.exp] Jan Kratochvil
2012-01-25 17:09 ` Tom Tromey
2012-01-25 17:27 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-01-25 16:20 ` Regression for gdb.mi/mi-nsmoribund.exp [Re: [4/4] RFC: implement catch load and catch unload] Tom Tromey
2012-02-20 8:28 ` [commit] catch-load.exp: Fix racy FAILs " Jan Kratochvil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m38vkxc8ak.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
--to=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=marc.khouzam@ericsson.com \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox