Re: [testsuite] Kfail signals.exp failures

[Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>]

Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org> writes:

>> On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 09:45:49AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> 
>>>>    Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2004 19:18:10 -0400
>>>>    From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
>>>>    2004-08-08  Daniel Jacobowitz  <dan@debian.org>
>>>> 	   PR gdb/1738
>>>> 	   * gdb.base/signals.exp (signal_tests_1): KFAIL bug in continuing
>>>> 	   from a breakpoint with a pending signal.
>>>> Hmm, SPARC doesn't have hardware single-step.  Solaris SPARC has
>>>> single-stepping implemented in the kernel, but all other OS'es don't
>>>> have that.
>> I wonder if this test passes anywhere?  Thinking about it again, the
>> software singlestep breakpoint is inserted when !breakpoints_inserted,
>> so the same problem should apply.
>
> Yep.  The existing test passes on s390 GNU/Linux:
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-testers/2004-q3/msg00068.html
> and my local PPC NetBSD machine.  Both have h/w single-step.

FWIW, it also passes on m68k-linux.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."