Re: [testsuite] Kfail signals.exp failures

[Michael Chastain <mec.gnu@mindspring.com>]

Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org> wrote:
> You appear to have found a new bug.  Given all the potential 
> combinations of step / next / continue VS breakpoint at/in handler VS 
> handle its self, we may want to split this out of signals.exp and into a 
> new expanded test file.  Either way, a new test is needed.
>
> BTW, does sigbpt.exp pass?  It's testing a related stepi edge case.
>
> Michael, those KFAILs are not correct.

Mmmm, I seem to have put my foot in it.  I will admit that I am beyond
my depth in dealing with the signals tests.

Perhaps we should move all the signals tests to a new subdirectory
gdb.signal, and delegate someone else to be senior maintainer for
that subdirectory?  I would feel competent to be junior maintainer.

If we don't do that, then I'm going to try something new in gdb
maintainership: delegation.  I'll ask for 2 or 3 expert volunteers,
and I'll approve a signals patch just when there's unanimous consent
among the experts.

And I've made a note to read up on signals tests.

Michael C