From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29203 invoked by alias); 9 Aug 2004 16:44:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29192 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2004 16:44:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp6.mindspring.com) (207.69.200.110) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 9 Aug 2004 16:44:31 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by smtp6.mindspring.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1BuDG5-0003Ba-00; Mon, 09 Aug 2004 12:44:25 -0400 Received: from mindspring.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D98D4B102; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 12:44:28 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 16:44:00 -0000 From: Michael Chastain To: drow@false.org, cagney@gnu.org Subject: Re: [testsuite] Kfail signals.exp failures Cc: kettenis@chello.nl, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Message-ID: <4117A9EC.nail4LF31OFF4@mindspring.com> References: <20040808231810.GA24826@nevyn.them.org> <200408090745.i797jnFc000594@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <20040809131105.GA27539@nevyn.them.org> <41178316.7000906@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <41178316.7000906@gnu.org> User-Agent: nail 10.8 6/28/04 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00317.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney wrote: > You appear to have found a new bug. Given all the potential > combinations of step / next / continue VS breakpoint at/in handler VS > handle its self, we may want to split this out of signals.exp and into a > new expanded test file. Either way, a new test is needed. > > BTW, does sigbpt.exp pass? It's testing a related stepi edge case. > > Michael, those KFAILs are not correct. Mmmm, I seem to have put my foot in it. I will admit that I am beyond my depth in dealing with the signals tests. Perhaps we should move all the signals tests to a new subdirectory gdb.signal, and delegate someone else to be senior maintainer for that subdirectory? I would feel competent to be junior maintainer. If we don't do that, then I'm going to try something new in gdb maintainership: delegation. I'll ask for 2 or 3 expert volunteers, and I'll approve a signals patch just when there's unanimous consent among the experts. And I've made a note to read up on signals tests. Michael C