From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29447 invoked by alias); 9 Aug 2004 19:43:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29435 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2004 19:43:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Cantor.suse.de) (195.135.220.2) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 9 Aug 2004 19:43:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.suse.de (hermes-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77E5EA15FC9; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 21:43:38 +0200 (CEST) To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , mec.gnu@mindspring.com, Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [testsuite] Kfail signals.exp failures References: <20040808231810.GA24826@nevyn.them.org> <200408090745.i797jnFc000594@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <20040809131105.GA27539@nevyn.them.org> <41178316.7000906@gnu.org> From: Andreas Schwab X-Yow: Everywhere I look I see NEGATIVITY and ASPHALT... Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 19:43:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <41178316.7000906@gnu.org> (Andrew Cagney's message of "Mon, 09 Aug 2004 09:58:46 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00333.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney writes: >> On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 09:45:49AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: >> >>>> Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2004 19:18:10 -0400 >>>> From: Daniel Jacobowitz >>>> 2004-08-08 Daniel Jacobowitz >>>> PR gdb/1738 >>>> * gdb.base/signals.exp (signal_tests_1): KFAIL bug in continuing >>>> from a breakpoint with a pending signal. >>>> Hmm, SPARC doesn't have hardware single-step. Solaris SPARC has >>>> single-stepping implemented in the kernel, but all other OS'es don't >>>> have that. >> I wonder if this test passes anywhere? Thinking about it again, the >> software singlestep breakpoint is inserted when !breakpoints_inserted, >> so the same problem should apply. > > Yep. The existing test passes on s390 GNU/Linux: > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-testers/2004-q3/msg00068.html > and my local PPC NetBSD machine. Both have h/w single-step. FWIW, it also passes on m68k-linux. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."