* GDB 8.2 branch WEDNESDAY? (2018-07-02 update)
@ 2018-07-02 20:18 Joel Brobecker
2018-07-02 20:58 ` Philippe Waroquiers
2018-07-02 23:06 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2018-07-02 20:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
Hi everyone,
Fixed since the last update:
* (JoelB) SEGV on x86_64-windows due to fs_base/gs_base
Still in progress:
* (PhilippeW) Implement 'frame apply COMMAND', enhance 'thread apply COMMAND'
v3 sent on June 24th:
https://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2018-06/msg00559.html
At this point, it looks to me like there are still some questions
related to the new command-line interface itself, so it seems
better to give our the time to think this through. Let's keep
the pressure on, to get this patch series over the hump, but
let's also give ourselves the opportunity to observe the patch
in the master branch for a while before it makes it to a release.
Not blocking for the branch, but requested as nice to have:
* (AlanH) core file suport for aarch64 SVE
https://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2018-06/msg00580.html
ping: https://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2018-07/msg00015.html
The other two known issues are not blocking, IMO:
* (KevinB) gdb/23021 - Setting breakpoints with -freorder-blocks-and-partition
Not a regression, easy workaround.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23021
* (MaciejR) tdep/8282 - MIPS port needs `set disassembler-options'
Enhancement.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8282
All in all, I think we should go ahead and create the branch Wednesday.
We can still backport some patches if they are shown to have some benefit
while being reasonably safe or having a limited impact.
Thanks!
--
Joel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: GDB 8.2 branch WEDNESDAY? (2018-07-02 update) 2018-07-02 20:18 GDB 8.2 branch WEDNESDAY? (2018-07-02 update) Joel Brobecker @ 2018-07-02 20:58 ` Philippe Waroquiers 2018-07-02 22:12 ` Joel Brobecker 2018-07-02 23:06 ` Maciej W. Rozycki 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Philippe Waroquiers @ 2018-07-02 20:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joel Brobecker, gdb-patches On Mon, 2018-07-02 at 13:18 -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: > Still in progress: > > * (PhilippeW) Implement 'frame apply COMMAND', enhance 'thread apply COMMAND' > v3 sent on June 24th: > https://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2018-06/msg00559.html > > At this point, it looks to me like there are still some questions > related to the new command-line interface itself, so it seems > better to give our the time to think this through. Let's keep > the pressure on, to get this patch series over the hump, but > let's also give ourselves the opportunity to observe the patch > in the master branch for a while before it makes it to a release. To my knowledge, v3 implements all what was discussed with Pedro. However, we still have a question related to the 'compatibility' between this patch and the patch  https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2018-06/msg00170.html regarding using 'id' or 'level' to identify a frame. So, effectively, we better agree on that aspect before pushing (in the master branch then) ... Thanks Philippe ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: GDB 8.2 branch WEDNESDAY? (2018-07-02 update) 2018-07-02 20:58 ` Philippe Waroquiers @ 2018-07-02 22:12 ` Joel Brobecker 2018-07-03 4:03 ` Philippe Waroquiers 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Joel Brobecker @ 2018-07-02 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Philippe Waroquiers; +Cc: gdb-patches > > * (PhilippeW) Implement 'frame apply COMMAND', enhance 'thread apply COMMAND' > > v3 sent on June 24th: > > https://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2018-06/msg00559.html > > > > At this point, it looks to me like there are still some questions > > related to the new command-line interface itself, so it seems > > better to give our the time to think this through. Let's keep > > the pressure on, to get this patch series over the hump, but > > let's also give ourselves the opportunity to observe the patch > > in the master branch for a while before it makes it to a release. > To my knowledge, v3 implements all what was discussed with Pedro. > However, we still have a question related to the 'compatibility' > between this patch and the patch > Â https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2018-06/msg00170.html > regarding using 'id' or 'level' to identify a frame. > > So, effectively, we better agree on that aspect before pushing > (in the master branch then) ... That is indeed my main concern, and considering the proposed branching date, I am thinking it might be tight to get an agreement. And if we do get an agreement in time, would it make sense to wait after the branch or not? I haven't followed the thread very closely, so I'll defer to your judgement as well as the Pedro's. -- Joel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: GDB 8.2 branch WEDNESDAY? (2018-07-02 update) 2018-07-02 22:12 ` Joel Brobecker @ 2018-07-03 4:03 ` Philippe Waroquiers 2018-07-03 16:59 ` Pedro Alves 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Philippe Waroquiers @ 2018-07-03 4:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joel Brobecker; +Cc: gdb-patches On Mon, 2018-07-02 at 15:12 -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > > * (PhilippeW) Implement 'frame apply COMMAND', enhance 'thread apply COMMAND' > > > v3 sent on June 24th: > > > https://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2018-06/msg00559.html > > > > > > At this point, it looks to me like there are still some questions > > > related to the new command-line interface itself, so it seems > > > better to give our the time to think this through. Let's keep > > > the pressure on, to get this patch series over the hump, but > > > let's also give ourselves the opportunity to observe the patch > > > in the master branch for a while before it makes it to a release. > > > > To my knowledge, v3 implements all what was discussed with Pedro. > > However, we still have a question related to the 'compatibility' > > between this patch and the patch > > Â https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2018-06/msg00170.html > > regarding using 'id' or 'level' to identify a frame. > > > > So, effectively, we better agree on that aspect before pushing > > (in the master branch then) ... > > That is indeed my main concern, and considering the proposed branching > date, I am thinking it might be tight to get an agreement. And if we > do get an agreement in time, would it make sense to wait after the > branch or not? I haven't followed the thread very closely, so I'll > defer to your judgement as well as the Pedro's. IMO, it would make sense to wait after the branch, so as to have time to see the 2 patches together in the master branch, and adjust if needed. But I will not too strongly object if Pedro is really keen on pushing it in earlier :). Philippe ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: GDB 8.2 branch WEDNESDAY? (2018-07-02 update) 2018-07-03 4:03 ` Philippe Waroquiers @ 2018-07-03 16:59 ` Pedro Alves 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Pedro Alves @ 2018-07-03 16:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Philippe Waroquiers, Joel Brobecker; +Cc: gdb-patches On 07/03/2018 05:03 AM, Philippe Waroquiers wrote: > On Mon, 2018-07-02 at 15:12 -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: >>>> * (PhilippeW) Implement 'frame apply COMMAND', enhance 'thread apply COMMAND' >>>> v3 sent on June 24th: >>>> https://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2018-06/msg00559.html >>>> >>>> At this point, it looks to me like there are still some questions >>>> related to the new command-line interface itself, so it seems >>>> better to give our the time to think this through. Let's keep >>>> the pressure on, to get this patch series over the hump, but >>>> let's also give ourselves the opportunity to observe the patch >>>> in the master branch for a while before it makes it to a release. >>> >>> To my knowledge, v3 implements all what was discussed with Pedro. >>> However, we still have a question related to the 'compatibility' >>> between this patch and the patch >>> Â https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2018-06/msg00170.html >>> regarding using 'id' or 'level' to identify a frame. >>> >>> So, effectively, we better agree on that aspect before pushing >>> (in the master branch then) ... >> >> That is indeed my main concern, and considering the proposed branching >> date, I am thinking it might be tight to get an agreement. And if we >> do get an agreement in time, would it make sense to wait after the >> branch or not? I haven't followed the thread very closely, so I'll >> defer to your judgement as well as the Pedro's. > > IMO, it would make sense to wait after the branch, so as to have > time to see the 2 patches together in the master branch, and adjust > if needed I agree, even though I feel a little guilty that the patches are taking so long to be reviewed. Sorry about that. I would prefer to mature the patches on master personally, to avoid issues with getting stuck with some user interface issue we may run into once we get more exposure. > But I will not too strongly object if Pedro is really keen on pushing > it in earlier :). I'm not. :-) I'm downloading the v3 series to start playing with it. I'll try to reply back soon. Thanks, Pedro Alves ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: GDB 8.2 branch WEDNESDAY? (2018-07-02 update) 2018-07-02 20:18 GDB 8.2 branch WEDNESDAY? (2018-07-02 update) Joel Brobecker 2018-07-02 20:58 ` Philippe Waroquiers @ 2018-07-02 23:06 ` Maciej W. Rozycki 1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Maciej W. Rozycki @ 2018-07-02 23:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joel Brobecker; +Cc: gdb-patches Hi Joel, > * (MaciejR) tdep/8282 - MIPS port needs `set disassembler-options' > Enhancement. > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8282 Now committed, so not a concern anymore. Maciej ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-07-03 16:59 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2018-07-02 20:18 GDB 8.2 branch WEDNESDAY? (2018-07-02 update) Joel Brobecker 2018-07-02 20:58 ` Philippe Waroquiers 2018-07-02 22:12 ` Joel Brobecker 2018-07-03 4:03 ` Philippe Waroquiers 2018-07-03 16:59 ` Pedro Alves 2018-07-02 23:06 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox