From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 108132 invoked by alias); 3 Jul 2018 04:03:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 108121 invoked by uid 89); 3 Jul 2018 04:03:44 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=keen, Hx-languages-length:1699, opportunity, our X-HELO: mailsec111.isp.belgacom.be Received: from mailsec111.isp.belgacom.be (HELO mailsec111.isp.belgacom.be) (195.238.20.107) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Jul 2018 04:03:40 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=skynet.be; i=@skynet.be; q=dns/txt; s=securemail; t=1530590620; x=1562126620; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=prjZVtS1uH686bhQGBXy3a+yfG3OGU3v2T9v95ZX0iU=; b=uA2PzbdtrXRSSqPYFboDFOqbujsdQ7NassnZL4YaFBavvgnX9hTOwgsy V1jIfYUrOETBkoESXbd1No4KUYBIFQ==; Received: from 224.41-64-87.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO md) ([87.64.41.224]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Jul 2018 06:03:37 +0200 Message-ID: <1530590617.29413.14.camel@skynet.be> Subject: Re: GDB 8.2 branch WEDNESDAY? (2018-07-02 update) From: Philippe Waroquiers To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2018 04:03:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20180702221233.GA30500@adacore.com> References: <20180702201833.GA1080@adacore.com> <1530565121.29413.10.camel@skynet.be> <20180702221233.GA30500@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-07/txt/msg00043.txt.bz2 On Mon, 2018-07-02 at 15:12 -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > > * (PhilippeW) Implement 'frame apply COMMAND', enhance 'thread apply COMMAND' > > > v3 sent on June 24th: > > > https://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2018-06/msg00559.html > > > > > > At this point, it looks to me like there are still some questions > > > related to the new command-line interface itself, so it seems > > > better to give our the time to think this through. Let's keep > > > the pressure on, to get this patch series over the hump, but > > > let's also give ourselves the opportunity to observe the patch > > > in the master branch for a while before it makes it to a release. > > > > To my knowledge, v3 implements all what was discussed with Pedro. > > However, we still have a question related to the 'compatibility' > > between this patch and the patch > >   https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2018-06/msg00170.html > > regarding using 'id' or 'level' to identify a frame. > > > > So, effectively, we better agree on that aspect before pushing > > (in the master branch then) ... > > That is indeed my main concern, and considering the proposed branching > date, I am thinking it might be tight to get an agreement. And if we > do get an agreement in time, would it make sense to wait after the > branch or not? I haven't followed the thread very closely, so I'll > defer to your judgement as well as the Pedro's. IMO, it would make sense to wait after the branch, so as to have time to see the 2 patches together in the master branch, and adjust if needed. But I will not too strongly object if Pedro is really keen on pushing it in earlier :). Philippe