From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 76058 invoked by alias); 2 Jul 2018 20:58:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 76045 invoked by uid 89); 2 Jul 2018 20:58:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=pushing, msg00170.html, UD:msg00170.html, msg00170html X-HELO: mailsec104.isp.belgacom.be Received: from mailsec104.isp.belgacom.be (HELO mailsec104.isp.belgacom.be) (195.238.20.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Jul 2018 20:58:44 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=skynet.be; i=@skynet.be; q=dns/txt; s=securemail; t=1530565124; x=1562101124; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DaWTQtVHN5b04RAJffikQOfKPVncv7KU+vwsC5lCU1U=; b=JwHbv3Awu0kmG/mBShCE0Q/VcmXU8Hg6TthdFnhE1157vi42VqAU2GIH a4HDJwYVdj9HwWT/hJmdd4LN1Ed98A==; Received: from 224.41-64-87.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO md) ([87.64.41.224]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Jul 2018 22:58:42 +0200 Message-ID: <1530565121.29413.10.camel@skynet.be> Subject: Re: GDB 8.2 branch WEDNESDAY? (2018-07-02 update) From: Philippe Waroquiers To: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2018 20:58:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20180702201833.GA1080@adacore.com> References: <20180702201833.GA1080@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-07/txt/msg00033.txt.bz2 On Mon, 2018-07-02 at 13:18 -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: > Still in progress: > > * (PhilippeW) Implement 'frame apply COMMAND', enhance 'thread apply COMMAND' > v3 sent on June 24th: > https://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2018-06/msg00559.html > > At this point, it looks to me like there are still some questions > related to the new command-line interface itself, so it seems > better to give our the time to think this through. Let's keep > the pressure on, to get this patch series over the hump, but > let's also give ourselves the opportunity to observe the patch > in the master branch for a while before it makes it to a release. To my knowledge, v3 implements all what was discussed with Pedro. However, we still have a question related to the 'compatibility' between this patch and the patch   https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2018-06/msg00170.html regarding using 'id' or 'level' to identify a frame. So, effectively, we better agree on that aspect before pushing (in the master branch then) ... Thanks Philippe