Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
To: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] [gdb/testsuite] Refactor exception handling in with_stub_devices
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 21:06:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ebca4723-b42a-48ed-a6dd-083441b257c3@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9da9e1c1-bf93-4bd0-9886-cc208962aca0@redhat.com>

On 9/1/26 6:10 PM, Keith Seitz wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 8/24/26 6:58 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
>> Use with_override and try/finally to simplify with_stub_devices.
>>
>> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34552
>> ---
>>   gdb/testsuite/gdb.rocm/hcc-amdgpu-targets.exp | 15 +++++++++------
>>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.rocm/hcc-amdgpu-targets.exp b/gdb/ 
>> testsuite/gdb.rocm/hcc-amdgpu-targets.exp
>> index 8f04cca7981..7f90a112138 100644
>> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.rocm/hcc-amdgpu-targets.exp
>> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.rocm/hcc-amdgpu-targets.exp
>> @@ -24,13 +24,16 @@ load_lib rocm.exp
>>   # Run BODY with find_amdgpu_devices stubbed to return DEVICES, then
>>   # restore the original proc.
>>   proc with_stub_devices {devices body} {
>> -    rename find_amdgpu_devices __saved_find_amdgpu_devices
>>       # tclint-disable-next-line command-args
>> -    proc find_amdgpu_devices {} [list return $devices]
>> -    set code [catch {uplevel 1 $body} result]
>> -    rename find_amdgpu_devices {}
>> -    rename __saved_find_amdgpu_devices find_amdgpu_devices
>> -    return -code $code $result
>> +    proc with_stub_devices_find_amdgpu_devices {} [list return $devices]
>> +    try {
>> +    # tclint-disable-next-line command-args
>> +    with_override \
>> +        find_amdgpu_devices with_stub_devices_find_amdgpu_devices \
>> +        $body
>> +    } finally {
>> +    rename with_stub_devices_find_amdgpu_devices {}
>> +    }
> 
> IIUC, this try block using with_override is effectively evaluating
> "$body" in this context (with_stub_devices). Previously the
> uplevel would cause this to run in the caller.
> 
> Is this missing a call to transparent_uplevel?
> 

It is, thanks for catching that.

I'm about to push this, with a fix.

Thanks,
- Tom

> Keith
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-23 19:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-24 13:58 [PATCH 00/11] [gdb/testsuite] Refactor exception handling Tom de Vries
2026-08-24 13:58 ` [PATCH 01/11] [gdb/testsuite] Normalize indentation in with_test_prefix Tom de Vries
2026-09-02 19:41   ` Tom Tromey
2026-09-04  9:48     ` Tom de Vries
2026-08-24 13:58 ` [PATCH 02/11] [gdb/testsuite] Fix return -level 2 bug " Tom de Vries
2026-09-02 19:46   ` Tom Tromey
2026-09-23 21:36     ` Tom de Vries
2026-09-24 14:18       ` Tom de Vries
2026-08-24 13:58 ` [PATCH 03/11] [gdb/testsuite] Simplify foreach_with_prefix Tom de Vries
2026-09-24 14:10   ` Tom de Vries
2026-08-24 13:58 ` [PATCH 04/11] [gdb/testsuite] Refactor exception handling in foreach_with_prefix Tom de Vries
2026-08-24 13:58 ` [PATCH 05/11] [gdb/testsuite] Add transparent_uplevel Tom de Vries
2026-09-01 16:16   ` Keith Seitz
2026-09-23 19:05     ` Tom de Vries
2026-08-24 13:58 ` [PATCH 06/11] [gdb/testsuite] Refactor exception handling Tom de Vries
2026-08-24 13:58 ` [PATCH 07/11] [gdb/testsuite] Refactor exception handling in gdb_expect Tom de Vries
2026-08-24 13:58 ` [PATCH 08/11] [gdb/testsuite] Refactor exception handling in gdb_test_multiple Tom de Vries
2026-08-25  7:29   ` Tom de Vries
2026-09-01 16:13   ` Keith Seitz
2026-09-24 16:03     ` Tom de Vries
2026-08-24 13:58 ` [PATCH 09/11] [gdb/testsuite] Refactor exception handling in lock_file_acquire/release Tom de Vries
2026-08-24 13:58 ` [PATCH 10/11] [gdb/testsuite] Refactor exception handling in tentative_rename Tom de Vries
2026-08-24 13:58 ` [PATCH 11/11] [gdb/testsuite] Refactor exception handling in with_stub_devices Tom de Vries
2026-09-01 16:10   ` Keith Seitz
2026-09-23 19:06     ` Tom de Vries [this message]
2026-09-01 17:07 ` [PATCH 00/11] [gdb/testsuite] Refactor exception handling Keith Seitz
2026-09-02 19:57   ` Tom Tromey
2026-09-24 16:08     ` Tom de Vries

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ebca4723-b42a-48ed-a6dd-083441b257c3@suse.de \
    --to=tdevries@suse.de \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=keiths@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox