From: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][gdb/testsuite] Fix PATH error in gdb_file_cmd
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 15:05:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e4a0f16b-685e-794f-dfda-4a5b97307adb@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1fe127b1-7238-1348-138a-58d8c5fd477d@redhat.com>
On 04-06-2020 14:18, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 6/4/20 12:51 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
>> On 04-06-2020 13:43, Pedro Alves wrote:
>>> On 6/4/20 11:24 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
>>> I have no idea why this one is a fail while everywhere else
>>> in the procedure perror is used. Seems inconsistent.
>>
>> It is locally inconsistent indeed, but it is consistent with all other
>> handling of "A problem internal to GDB has been detected" in gdb.exp.
>
> If you look at those other spots, they are using fail/pass in the other
> surrounding -re's, and thus that's just another fail among all those.
> I.e., those cases are internally consistent. Like e.g.:
>
> -re "${sentinel}" {
> fail "${test} (pattern ${index} + sentinel)"
> set ok 0
> }
> -re ".*A problem internal to GDB has been detected" {
> fail "${test} (GDB internal error)"
> set ok 0
> gdb_internal_error_resync
> }
> timeout {
> fail "${test} (pattern ${index} + sentinel) (timeout)"
> set ok 0
> }
>
> The gdb_file_cmd one started out with a message string that didn't
> even include the parens around the "GDB internal error" string in 04e7407c59a:
>
> + -re "A problem internal to GDB has been detected" {
> + fail "($arg) GDB internal error"
> + gdb_internal_error_resync
> + return -1
> + }
>
> The parens were later added in 5b7d00507b9:
>
> -re "A problem internal to GDB has been detected" {
> - fail "($arg) GDB internal error"
> + fail "($arg) (GDB internal error)"
>
> Arguably that patch should have switched to perror instead.
> A FAIL message with only text wrapped in parens is odd,
> since the trailing "(foo)" text is not supposed to count as
> test message. So in effect, you could say that this fail has
> no test message, the same as if you wrote:
>
> fail ""
OK, I see your point, I'll prepare a patch for this, so let's settle on
the error message. How about:
...
- fail "($arg) (GDB internal error)"
+ perror "Couldn't load $arg into $GDB (GDB internal error)."
...
?
Thanks,
- Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-04 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-04 10:24 Tom de Vries
2020-06-04 10:45 ` [gdb/testsuite] Fix error handling " Tom de Vries
2020-06-04 11:51 ` Pedro Alves
2020-06-04 14:38 ` Tom de Vries
2020-06-04 11:43 ` [PATCH][gdb/testsuite] Fix PATH error " Pedro Alves
2020-06-04 11:51 ` Tom de Vries
2020-06-04 12:18 ` Pedro Alves
2020-06-04 13:05 ` Tom de Vries [this message]
2020-06-04 13:22 ` Pedro Alves
2020-06-04 14:18 ` [committed][gdb/testsuite] Fix use of fail in gdb_cmd_file Tom de Vries
2020-06-04 15:14 ` [PATCH][gdb/testsuite] Remove path names from error messages in gdb_file_cmd Tom de Vries
2020-06-04 15:27 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e4a0f16b-685e-794f-dfda-4a5b97307adb@suse.de \
--to=tdevries@suse.de \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox