From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
To: Lancelot SIX <lancelot.six@amd.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/11] gdb/solib-rocm: pass reference to cache to rocm_code_object_stream_file
Date: Thu, 7 May 2026 21:48:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c08a3238-0cb6-4014-bb3b-ab7aa9c4242b@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <lbfezu722whbhyhjq4iellabz2klj6pafp7vrjj4ssmo3tkbba@becfvzrnw2y4>
On 5/7/26 2:20 PM, Lancelot SIX wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2025 at 02:32:07PM -0500, Simon Marchi wrote:
>> ~rocm_code_object_stream_file obtains the fd cache to call "close" on
>> using its m_inf field, obtaining the per-inferior info using
>> get_solib_info. A patch later in this series moves the fd cache from
>> the per-inferior registry to the rocm_solib_ops directly. This implies
>> that we will need a new way to get a reference to the fd_cache owning
>> the fd, as it won't be easy to get it from the inferior anymore.
>>
>> To achieve this, update rocm_code_object_stream_file to keep a reference
>> to the fd cache directly (because the rocm_code_object_stream is not
>> meant to be copied nor moved, make the field a reference). The inferior
>> parameter and field are not needed anymore.
>>
>> Change-Id: Ia10f8f125840274e51e188cafcb7384fdff92240
>> ---
>> gdb/solib-rocm.c | 19 +++++++++----------
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/gdb/solib-rocm.c b/gdb/solib-rocm.c
>> index a9573f8eefde..bde34bafd8b1 100644
>> --- a/gdb/solib-rocm.c
>> +++ b/gdb/solib-rocm.c
>> @@ -360,8 +360,8 @@ struct rocm_code_object_stream_file final : rocm_code_object_stream
>> {
>> DISABLE_COPY_AND_ASSIGN (rocm_code_object_stream_file);
>>
>> - rocm_code_object_stream_file (inferior *inf, int fd, ULONGEST offset,
>> - ULONGEST size);
>> + rocm_code_object_stream_file (rocm_solib_fd_cache &fd_cache, int fd,
>> + ULONGEST offset, ULONGEST size);
>
> Just noting that this does not apply anymore, just need to change
> "int fd" to "target_fd fd".
Thanks, I saw that while rebasing.
>
> Other than that, this looks good to me.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Approved-by: Lancelot Six <lancelot.six@amd.com> (amdgpu)
Ack, thanks.
Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-08 1:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-09 19:32 [PATCH 00/11] Multiple solib_ops in a program_space Simon Marchi
2025-12-09 19:32 ` [PATCH 01/11] gdb/solib-rocm: assert that host ops isn't rocm_solib_ops Simon Marchi
2026-05-07 17:56 ` [PATCH 1/11] " Lancelot SIX
2026-05-08 1:37 ` Simon Marchi
2026-05-08 10:36 ` Lancelot SIX
2026-06-08 18:36 ` Simon Marchi
2025-12-09 19:32 ` [PATCH 02/11] gdb/solib: use early return in solib_read_symbols Simon Marchi
2026-04-28 16:16 ` Tom Tromey
2026-05-08 1:44 ` Simon Marchi
2025-12-09 19:32 ` [PATCH 03/11] gdb/solib-rocm: pass reference to cache to rocm_code_object_stream_file Simon Marchi
2026-05-07 18:20 ` [PATCH 3/11] " Lancelot SIX
2026-05-08 1:48 ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2025-12-09 19:32 ` [PATCH 04/11] gdb/solib-rocm: add cached_fd to manage cached fd lifetime Simon Marchi
2026-05-07 20:17 ` [PATCH 4/11] " Lancelot SIX
2026-05-08 1:52 ` Simon Marchi
2025-12-09 19:32 ` [PATCH 05/11] gdb: de-constify some methods of solib_ops Simon Marchi
2025-12-09 19:32 ` [PATCH 06/11] gdb/solib-rocm: move per-inferior data to rocm_solib_ops Simon Marchi
2026-04-28 16:19 ` Tom Tromey
2026-05-08 2:02 ` Simon Marchi
2025-12-09 19:32 ` [PATCH 07/11] gdb/solib-rocm: save inferior in rocm_solib_ops Simon Marchi
[not found] ` <87a4unm59w.fsf@tromey.com>
2026-05-08 2:10 ` Simon Marchi
2025-12-09 19:32 ` [PATCH 08/11] gdb/solib: add remove_solib function Simon Marchi
2026-04-28 16:23 ` Tom Tromey
2025-12-09 19:32 ` [PATCH 09/11] gdb: add objfile -> solib backlink Simon Marchi
2026-04-28 16:28 ` Tom Tromey
2026-05-08 2:25 ` Simon Marchi
2025-12-09 19:32 ` [PATCH 10/11] gdb: change default objfile iteration order to start with current objfile Simon Marchi
2026-04-28 16:42 ` Tom Tromey
2026-05-08 2:40 ` Simon Marchi
2025-12-09 19:32 ` [PATCH 11/11] gdb: multiple solib_ops per program space Simon Marchi
2026-04-28 17:27 ` Tom Tromey
2026-05-08 2:52 ` Simon Marchi
2026-04-28 16:00 ` [PATCH 00/11] Multiple solib_ops in a program_space Simon Marchi
2026-04-28 17:28 ` Tom Tromey
2026-05-08 2:40 ` Simon Marchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c08a3238-0cb6-4014-bb3b-ab7aa9c4242b@efficios.com \
--to=simon.marchi@efficios.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=lancelot.six@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox