* [commit] [avr] remove avr_push_dummy_code method.
@ 2003-06-19 19:32 Theodore A. Roth
2003-06-19 20:15 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Theodore A. Roth @ 2003-06-19 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 387 bytes --]
Hi,
Committed the attached.
This removes the avr_push_dummy_code function. It doesn't seem to be
needed and what I committed last night didn't return anything which
broke the -Werror build. :-(
Ted Roth
2003-06-19 Theodore A. Roth <troth@openavr.org>
* avr-tdep.c (avr_push_dummy_code): Delete function.
(avr_gdbarch_init): Don't call set_gdbarch_push_dummy_code.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 1534 bytes --]
2003-06-19 Theodore A. Roth <troth@openavr.org>
* avr-tdep.c (avr_push_dummy_code): Delete function.
(avr_gdbarch_init): Don't call set_gdbarch_push_dummy_code.
Index: avr-tdep.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/avr-tdep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.61
diff -u -p -r1.61 avr-tdep.c
--- avr-tdep.c 19 Jun 2003 08:09:54 -0000 1.61
+++ avr-tdep.c 19 Jun 2003 19:22:10 -0000
@@ -1128,16 +1128,6 @@ avr_unwind_dummy_id (struct gdbarch *gdb
return frame_id_build (avr_make_saddr (base), frame_pc_unwind (next_frame));
}
-static CORE_ADDR
-avr_push_dummy_code (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
- CORE_ADDR sp, CORE_ADDR funaddr, int using_gcc,
- struct value **args, int nargs,
- struct type *value_type,
- CORE_ADDR *real_pc, CORE_ADDR *bp_addr)
-{
- fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stderr, " ----->>>> push_dummy_code\n");
-}
-
/* When arguments must be pushed onto the stack, they go on in reverse
order. The below implements a FILO (stack) to do this. */
@@ -1357,7 +1347,6 @@ avr_gdbarch_init (struct gdbarch_info in
set_gdbarch_call_dummy_address (gdbarch, avr_call_dummy_address);
set_gdbarch_push_dummy_call (gdbarch, avr_push_dummy_call);
- set_gdbarch_push_dummy_code (gdbarch, avr_push_dummy_code);
set_gdbarch_address_to_pointer (gdbarch, avr_address_to_pointer);
set_gdbarch_pointer_to_address (gdbarch, avr_pointer_to_address);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [commit] [avr] remove avr_push_dummy_code method.
2003-06-19 19:32 [commit] [avr] remove avr_push_dummy_code method Theodore A. Roth
@ 2003-06-19 20:15 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-06-19 20:21 ` Theodore A. Roth
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2003-06-19 20:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Theodore A. Roth; +Cc: gdb-patches
> Hi,
>
> Committed the attached.
>
> This removes the avr_push_dummy_code function. It doesn't seem to be
> needed and what I committed last night didn't return anything which
> broke the -Werror build. :-(
Push dummy code only gets called when CALL_DUMMY_LOCATION == ON_STACK,
and even then, the default (just write a breakpoint onto the stack)
should be sufficient.
Unless AVR has something approaching the SPARC ABI that is.... (See the
quote from Peter Schauer in sparc-tdep.c).
Andrew
> 2003-06-19 Theodore A. Roth <troth@openavr.org>
>
> * avr-tdep.c (avr_push_dummy_code): Delete function.
> (avr_gdbarch_init): Don't call set_gdbarch_push_dummy_code.
>
>
>
> 2003-06-19 Theodore A. Roth <troth@openavr.org>
>
> * avr-tdep.c (avr_push_dummy_code): Delete function.
> (avr_gdbarch_init): Don't call set_gdbarch_push_dummy_code.
>
> Index: avr-tdep.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/avr-tdep.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.61
> diff -u -p -r1.61 avr-tdep.c
> --- avr-tdep.c 19 Jun 2003 08:09:54 -0000 1.61
> +++ avr-tdep.c 19 Jun 2003 19:22:10 -0000
> @@ -1128,16 +1128,6 @@ avr_unwind_dummy_id (struct gdbarch *gdb
> return frame_id_build (avr_make_saddr (base), frame_pc_unwind (next_frame));
> }
>
> -static CORE_ADDR
> -avr_push_dummy_code (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
> - CORE_ADDR sp, CORE_ADDR funaddr, int using_gcc,
> - struct value **args, int nargs,
> - struct type *value_type,
> - CORE_ADDR *real_pc, CORE_ADDR *bp_addr)
> -{
> - fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stderr, " ----->>>> push_dummy_code\n");
> -}
> -
> /* When arguments must be pushed onto the stack, they go on in reverse
> order. The below implements a FILO (stack) to do this. */
>
> @@ -1357,7 +1347,6 @@ avr_gdbarch_init (struct gdbarch_info in
>
> set_gdbarch_call_dummy_address (gdbarch, avr_call_dummy_address);
> set_gdbarch_push_dummy_call (gdbarch, avr_push_dummy_call);
> - set_gdbarch_push_dummy_code (gdbarch, avr_push_dummy_code);
>
> set_gdbarch_address_to_pointer (gdbarch, avr_address_to_pointer);
> set_gdbarch_pointer_to_address (gdbarch, avr_pointer_to_address);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [commit] [avr] remove avr_push_dummy_code method.
2003-06-19 20:15 ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2003-06-19 20:21 ` Theodore A. Roth
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Theodore A. Roth @ 2003-06-19 20:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: gdb-patches
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Committed the attached.
> >
> > This removes the avr_push_dummy_code function. It doesn't seem to be
> > needed and what I committed last night didn't return anything which
> > broke the -Werror build. :-(
>
> Push dummy code only gets called when CALL_DUMMY_LOCATION == ON_STACK,
> and even then, the default (just write a breakpoint onto the stack)
> should be sufficient.
>
> Unless AVR has something approaching the SPARC ABI that is.... (See the
> quote from Peter Schauer in sparc-tdep.c).
Thanks. That gives me more confidence that I really don't need that
funciton. I had looked at the code where CALL_DUMMY_LOCATION ==
ON_STACK and it looked like generic_push_dummy_code() was sufficient.
Ted Roth
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-06-19 20:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-06-19 19:32 [commit] [avr] remove avr_push_dummy_code method Theodore A. Roth
2003-06-19 20:15 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-06-19 20:21 ` Theodore A. Roth
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox