From: Brian Ford <ford@vss.fsi.com>
To: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386_stab_reg_to_regnum (4 <-> 5, ebp <-> esp)
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 14:53:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0404060938000.21204@thing1-200> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <vt2llla2e03.fsf@zenia.home>
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Jim Blandy wrote:
> Brian Ford writes:
> > ... I still propose we rename the _to_regnum functions, replacing
> > stabs and dwarf with dbx and svr4 to reduce confusion. I'll be happy to
> > make a patch :-).
>
> I agree that would be better.
>
> (I should make it clear that I can't approve this patch. We need Mark
> Kettenis's okay.)
Ok, I'll submit a patch after this thread is resolved.
> > On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Jim Blandy wrote:
> > > It's true that the comments for svr4_dbx_register_map in
> >
> > Just svr4_register_map (so noone gets confused).
>
> Really? I'm looking at revision 1.660 of gcc/config/i386/i386.c, like
> 657:
>
> int const svr4_dbx_register_map[FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER] =
>
> Not to be "back-atcha" or anything like that; this is just such a maze
> of twisty little...
You are correct. I guess I was just having an off day and I got it stuck
in my head wrong.
> > > ... every i386 GCC configuration uses either dbx_register_map or
> > > svr4_dbx_register_map for both debug formats.
> >
> > Agreed. I'm happy to stick with dbx_register_map on Cygwin for all debug
> > formats if a version of my patch is accepted. DWARF 2 (and STABS) will
> > work fine then. And, I'd be glad to help Eli sort through the
> > ramifications, since his is just about the only target to be affected.
>
> Sounds great.
Now we just need some words from Eli and an approval for your version of
my patch, I think.
--
Brian Ford
Senior Realtime Software Engineer
VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems
FlightSafety International
Phone: 314-551-8460
Fax: 314-551-8444
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-06 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-01 0:11 Brian Ford
2004-04-01 17:22 ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-01 18:00 ` Brian Ford
2004-04-01 21:29 ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-01 22:54 ` Brian Ford
2004-04-02 7:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
[not found] ` <Pine dot GSO dot 4 dot 58 dot 0404021000390 dot 21204 at thing1-200>
[not found] ` <2719-Fri02Apr2004213907+0300-eliz at gnu dot org>
[not found] ` <Pine dot GSO dot 4 dot 58 dot 0404021648050 dot 21204 at thing1-200>
2004-04-02 17:31 ` Brian Ford
2004-04-02 19:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-02 23:15 ` Brian Ford
2004-04-03 9:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-05 18:18 ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-05 21:57 ` Brian Ford
2004-04-18 16:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-05 18:21 ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-05 22:46 ` Brian Ford
2004-04-18 17:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-05 22:46 ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-05 23:19 ` Brian Ford
2004-04-05 23:38 ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-06 14:53 ` Brian Ford [this message]
2004-04-15 9:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-06 23:24 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-04-07 16:25 ` Brian Ford
2004-04-07 18:02 ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-07 20:06 ` [PATCH] Rename i386_xxx_reg_to_regnum Brian Ford
2004-04-07 20:48 ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-07 21:06 ` Brian Ford
2004-04-07 21:41 ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-09 12:37 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-04-09 17:49 ` Brian Ford
2004-04-06 23:23 ` [PATCH] i386_stab_reg_to_regnum (4 <-> 5, ebp <-> esp) Mark Kettenis
2004-04-07 16:46 ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-18 16:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-19 2:06 ` ix86 PE/COFF DWARF register numbering (was Re: [PATCH] i386_stab_reg_to_regnum (4 <-> 5, ebp <-> esp)) Brian Ford
2004-04-19 5:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-19 16:34 ` ix86 PE/COFF DWARF register numbering Brian Ford
2004-04-19 12:42 ` [PATCH] i386_stab_reg_to_regnum (4 <-> 5, ebp <-> esp) Jim Blandy
2004-04-19 7:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-02 19:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-02 22:47 ` Brian Ford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.GSO.4.58.0404060938000.21204@thing1-200 \
--to=ford@vss.fsi.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=jimb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox