Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Ford <ford@vss.fsi.com>
To: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386_stab_reg_to_regnum (4 <-> 5, ebp <-> esp)
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 14:53:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0404060938000.21204@thing1-200> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <vt2llla2e03.fsf@zenia.home>

On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Jim Blandy wrote:

> Brian Ford writes:
> > ... I still propose we rename the _to_regnum functions, replacing
> > stabs and dwarf with dbx and svr4 to reduce confusion.  I'll be happy to
> > make a patch :-).
>
> I agree that would be better.
>
> (I should make it clear that I can't approve this patch.  We need Mark
> Kettenis's okay.)

Ok, I'll submit a patch after this thread is resolved.

> > On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Jim Blandy wrote:
> > > It's true that the comments for svr4_dbx_register_map in
> >
> > Just svr4_register_map (so noone gets confused).
>
> Really?  I'm looking at revision 1.660 of gcc/config/i386/i386.c, like
> 657:
>
> int const svr4_dbx_register_map[FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER] =
>
> Not to be "back-atcha" or anything like that; this is just such a maze
> of twisty little...

You are correct.  I guess I was just having an off day and I got it stuck
in my head wrong.

> > > ... every i386 GCC configuration uses either dbx_register_map or
> > > svr4_dbx_register_map for both debug formats.
> >
> > Agreed.  I'm happy to stick with dbx_register_map on Cygwin for all debug
> > formats if a version of my patch is accepted.  DWARF 2 (and STABS) will
> > work fine then.  And, I'd be glad to help Eli sort through the
> > ramifications, since his is just about the only target to be affected.
>
> Sounds great.

Now we just need some words from Eli and an approval for your version of
my patch, I think.

-- 
Brian Ford
Senior Realtime Software Engineer
VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems
FlightSafety International
Phone: 314-551-8460
Fax:   314-551-8444


  reply	other threads:[~2004-04-06 14:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-04-01  0:11 Brian Ford
2004-04-01 17:22 ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-01 18:00   ` Brian Ford
2004-04-01 21:29     ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-01 22:54       ` Brian Ford
2004-04-02  7:45         ` Eli Zaretskii
     [not found]           ` <Pine dot GSO dot 4 dot 58 dot 0404021000390 dot 21204 at thing1-200>
     [not found]             ` <2719-Fri02Apr2004213907+0300-eliz at gnu dot org>
     [not found]               ` <Pine dot GSO dot 4 dot 58 dot 0404021648050 dot 21204 at thing1-200>
2004-04-02 17:31           ` Brian Ford
2004-04-02 19:42             ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-02 23:15               ` Brian Ford
2004-04-03  9:08                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-05 18:18                   ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-05 21:57                     ` Brian Ford
2004-04-18 16:33                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-05 18:21                   ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-05 22:46                   ` Brian Ford
2004-04-18 17:00                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-05 22:46                 ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-05 23:19                   ` Brian Ford
2004-04-05 23:38                     ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-06 14:53                       ` Brian Ford [this message]
2004-04-15  9:38                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-06 23:24                     ` Mark Kettenis
2004-04-07 16:25                       ` Brian Ford
2004-04-07 18:02                         ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-07 20:06                       ` [PATCH] Rename i386_xxx_reg_to_regnum Brian Ford
2004-04-07 20:48                         ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-07 21:06                           ` Brian Ford
2004-04-07 21:41                             ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-09 12:37                               ` Mark Kettenis
2004-04-09 17:49                                 ` Brian Ford
2004-04-06 23:23                   ` [PATCH] i386_stab_reg_to_regnum (4 <-> 5, ebp <-> esp) Mark Kettenis
2004-04-07 16:46                     ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-18 16:48                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-19  2:06                     ` ix86 PE/COFF DWARF register numbering (was Re: [PATCH] i386_stab_reg_to_regnum (4 <-> 5, ebp <-> esp)) Brian Ford
2004-04-19  5:59                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-19 16:34                         ` ix86 PE/COFF DWARF register numbering Brian Ford
2004-04-19 12:42                     ` [PATCH] i386_stab_reg_to_regnum (4 <-> 5, ebp <-> esp) Jim Blandy
2004-04-19  7:02                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-02 19:33           ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-02 22:47             ` Brian Ford

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.GSO.4.58.0404060938000.21204@thing1-200 \
    --to=ford@vss.fsi.com \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=jimb@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox