From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@chello.nl>
To: jimb@redhat.com
Cc: ford@vss.fsi.com, eliz@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386_stab_reg_to_regnum (4 <-> 5, ebp <-> esp)
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 23:23:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200404062322.i36NMqiE000976@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <vt2ptam2gg1.fsf@zenia.home> (message from Jim Blandy on 05 Apr 2004 17:44:14 -0500)
From: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
Date: 05 Apr 2004 17:44:14 -0500
I'm getting a bit lost, so let me try to sum up the discussion, for my
own sake. There are two distinct questions at hand:
- Should GDB's i386_stab_reg_to_regnum be changed?
For the first question: I think your original patch is correct.
Yup. I agree. I wonder whether I introduced the bug or that it has
always been wrong...
The bit-twiddling is correct, but I'd rather see something more
direct, like:
Index: gdb/i386-tdep.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/i386-tdep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.182
diff -c -c -F'^(' -r1.182 i386-tdep.c
*** gdb/i386-tdep.c 1 Apr 2004 18:14:03 -0000 1.182
--- gdb/i386-tdep.c 5 Apr 2004 22:15:01 -0000
***************
*** 211,218 ****
/* This implements what GCC calls the "default" register map. */
if (reg >= 0 && reg <= 7)
{
! /* General-purpose registers. */
! return reg;
}
else if (reg >= 12 && reg <= 19)
{
--- 211,223 ----
/* This implements what GCC calls the "default" register map. */
if (reg >= 0 && reg <= 7)
{
! /* General-purpose registers. The debug info calls %ebp
! register 4, and %esp register 5. */
! if (reg == 4)
! return 5;
! else if (reg == 5)
! return 4;
! else return reg;
}
else if (reg >= 12 && reg <= 19)
{
Jim, please apply this patch, with the proper ChangeLog of course.
Mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-06 23:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-01 0:11 Brian Ford
2004-04-01 17:22 ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-01 18:00 ` Brian Ford
2004-04-01 21:29 ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-01 22:54 ` Brian Ford
2004-04-02 7:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
[not found] ` <Pine dot GSO dot 4 dot 58 dot 0404021000390 dot 21204 at thing1-200>
[not found] ` <2719-Fri02Apr2004213907+0300-eliz at gnu dot org>
[not found] ` <Pine dot GSO dot 4 dot 58 dot 0404021648050 dot 21204 at thing1-200>
2004-04-02 17:31 ` Brian Ford
2004-04-02 19:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-02 23:15 ` Brian Ford
2004-04-03 9:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-05 18:18 ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-05 21:57 ` Brian Ford
2004-04-18 16:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-05 18:21 ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-05 22:46 ` Brian Ford
2004-04-18 17:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-05 22:46 ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-05 23:19 ` Brian Ford
2004-04-05 23:38 ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-06 14:53 ` Brian Ford
2004-04-15 9:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-06 23:24 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-04-07 16:25 ` Brian Ford
2004-04-07 18:02 ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-07 20:06 ` [PATCH] Rename i386_xxx_reg_to_regnum Brian Ford
2004-04-07 20:48 ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-07 21:06 ` Brian Ford
2004-04-07 21:41 ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-09 12:37 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-04-09 17:49 ` Brian Ford
2004-04-06 23:23 ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2004-04-07 16:46 ` [PATCH] i386_stab_reg_to_regnum (4 <-> 5, ebp <-> esp) Jim Blandy
2004-04-18 16:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-19 2:06 ` ix86 PE/COFF DWARF register numbering (was Re: [PATCH] i386_stab_reg_to_regnum (4 <-> 5, ebp <-> esp)) Brian Ford
2004-04-19 5:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-19 16:34 ` ix86 PE/COFF DWARF register numbering Brian Ford
2004-04-19 12:42 ` [PATCH] i386_stab_reg_to_regnum (4 <-> 5, ebp <-> esp) Jim Blandy
2004-04-19 7:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-02 19:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-02 22:47 ` Brian Ford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200404062322.i36NMqiE000976@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org \
--to=kettenis@chello.nl \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=ford@vss.fsi.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=jimb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox