Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@chello.nl>
To: jimb@redhat.com
Cc: ford@vss.fsi.com, eliz@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386_stab_reg_to_regnum (4 <-> 5, ebp <-> esp)
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 23:23:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200404062322.i36NMqiE000976@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <vt2ptam2gg1.fsf@zenia.home> (message from Jim Blandy on 05 Apr 2004 17:44:14 -0500)

   From: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
   Date: 05 Apr 2004 17:44:14 -0500

   I'm getting a bit lost, so let me try to sum up the discussion, for my
   own sake.  There are two distinct questions at hand:

   - Should GDB's i386_stab_reg_to_regnum be changed?

   For the first question: I think your original patch is correct.

Yup. I agree.  I wonder whether I introduced the bug or that it has
always been wrong...

   The bit-twiddling is correct, but I'd rather see something more
   direct, like:

   Index: gdb/i386-tdep.c
   ===================================================================
   RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/i386-tdep.c,v
   retrieving revision 1.182
   diff -c -c -F'^(' -r1.182 i386-tdep.c
   *** gdb/i386-tdep.c	1 Apr 2004 18:14:03 -0000	1.182
   --- gdb/i386-tdep.c	5 Apr 2004 22:15:01 -0000
   ***************
   *** 211,218 ****
       /* This implements what GCC calls the "default" register map.  */
       if (reg >= 0 && reg <= 7)
	 {
   !       /* General-purpose registers.  */
   !       return reg;
	 }
       else if (reg >= 12 && reg <= 19)
	 {
   --- 211,223 ----
       /* This implements what GCC calls the "default" register map.  */
       if (reg >= 0 && reg <= 7)
	 {
   !       /* General-purpose registers.  The debug info calls %ebp
   !          register 4, and %esp register 5.  */
   !       if (reg == 4)
   !         return 5;
   !       else if (reg == 5)
   !         return 4;
   !       else return reg;
	 }
       else if (reg >= 12 && reg <= 19)
	 {

Jim, please apply this patch, with the proper ChangeLog of course.

Mark


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-04-06 23:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-04-01  0:11 Brian Ford
2004-04-01 17:22 ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-01 18:00   ` Brian Ford
2004-04-01 21:29     ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-01 22:54       ` Brian Ford
2004-04-02  7:45         ` Eli Zaretskii
     [not found]           ` <Pine dot GSO dot 4 dot 58 dot 0404021000390 dot 21204 at thing1-200>
     [not found]             ` <2719-Fri02Apr2004213907+0300-eliz at gnu dot org>
     [not found]               ` <Pine dot GSO dot 4 dot 58 dot 0404021648050 dot 21204 at thing1-200>
2004-04-02 17:31           ` Brian Ford
2004-04-02 19:42             ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-02 23:15               ` Brian Ford
2004-04-03  9:08                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-05 18:18                   ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-05 21:57                     ` Brian Ford
2004-04-18 16:33                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-05 18:21                   ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-05 22:46                   ` Brian Ford
2004-04-18 17:00                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-05 22:46                 ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-05 23:19                   ` Brian Ford
2004-04-05 23:38                     ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-06 14:53                       ` Brian Ford
2004-04-15  9:38                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-06 23:24                     ` Mark Kettenis
2004-04-07 16:25                       ` Brian Ford
2004-04-07 18:02                         ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-07 20:06                       ` [PATCH] Rename i386_xxx_reg_to_regnum Brian Ford
2004-04-07 20:48                         ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-07 21:06                           ` Brian Ford
2004-04-07 21:41                             ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-09 12:37                               ` Mark Kettenis
2004-04-09 17:49                                 ` Brian Ford
2004-04-06 23:23                   ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2004-04-07 16:46                     ` [PATCH] i386_stab_reg_to_regnum (4 <-> 5, ebp <-> esp) Jim Blandy
2004-04-18 16:48                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-19  2:06                     ` ix86 PE/COFF DWARF register numbering (was Re: [PATCH] i386_stab_reg_to_regnum (4 <-> 5, ebp <-> esp)) Brian Ford
2004-04-19  5:59                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-19 16:34                         ` ix86 PE/COFF DWARF register numbering Brian Ford
2004-04-19 12:42                     ` [PATCH] i386_stab_reg_to_regnum (4 <-> 5, ebp <-> esp) Jim Blandy
2004-04-19  7:02                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-02 19:33           ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-02 22:47             ` Brian Ford

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200404062322.i36NMqiE000976@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org \
    --to=kettenis@chello.nl \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=ford@vss.fsi.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=jimb@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox