Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Ford <ford@vss.fsi.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH] i386_stab_reg_to_regnum (4 <-> 5, ebp <-> esp)
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 00:11:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0403311727300.21204@thing1-200> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 2195 bytes --]

I noticed this while tracking down another problem with adding DWARF2
support to Cygwin.  (Jim Blandy knows which one.  Thanks again Jim :^),
and this is not necessarily related to that.)

In gcc/config/i386/i386.c, we have:

/* The "default" register map used in 32bit mode.  */

int const dbx_register_map[FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER] =
{
  0, 2, 1, 3, 6, 7, 4, 5,               /* general regs */
  12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19,       /* fp regs */
  -1, -1, -1, -1, -1,                   /* arg, flags, fpsr, dir, frame */
  21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28,       /* SSE */
  29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36,       /* MMX */
  -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1,       /* extended integer registers */
  -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1,       /* extended SSE registers */
};

and:

/* Define the register numbers to be used in Dwarf debugging information. */

int const svr4_dbx_register_map[FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER] =
{
  0, 2, 1, 3, 6, 7, 5, 4,               /* general regs */
  11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18,       /* fp regs */
  -1, 9, -1, -1, -1,                    /* arg, flags, fpsr, dir, frame */
  21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28,       /* SSE registers */
  29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36,       /* MMX registers */
  -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1,       /* extended integer registers */
  -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1,       /* extended SSE registers */
};

Notice that gcc regno 6 (ebp) and 7 (esp) map to regno 4 and 5
respectively in the "default" (aka dbx, stabs, sdb) table.  But, in
the svr4 (aka dwarf, dwarf2, stabs-in-elf) table, they map to regno 5 and
4 respectively.

I'm not sure if/how this should affect i386_register_names.  I also hope
that targets have not already coded around this bug so that fixing it will
break something else :-).  Please do have a look at these issues before
applying the patch.  I'm afraid they are over my head right now.

Thanks.

2004-03-31  Brian Ford  <ford@vss.fsi.com>

	* i386-tdep.c (i386_stab_reg_to_regnum): Reverse 4 and 5
	(ebp and esp respectively) to match the gdb/DWARF regnums.

-- 
Brian Ford
Senior Realtime Software Engineer
VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems
FlightSafety International
Phone: 314-551-8460
Fax:   314-551-8444

[-- Attachment #2: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 721 bytes --]

Index: i386-tdep.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/i386-tdep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.181
diff -u -p -r1.181 i386-tdep.c
--- i386-tdep.c	23 Mar 2004 14:47:56 -0000	1.181
+++ i386-tdep.c	31 Mar 2004 23:25:52 -0000
@@ -175,8 +175,10 @@ i386_stab_reg_to_regnum (int reg)
   /* This implements what GCC calls the "default" register map.  */
   if (reg >= 0 && reg <= 7)
     {
-      /* General-purpose registers.  */
-      return reg;
+      /* General-purpose registers.
+	 ebp and esp (4, 5) are reversed with respect to gdb and DWARF. */
+
+      return (reg & 6) == 4 ? reg ^ 1 : reg;
     }
   else if (reg >= 12 && reg <= 19)
     {

             reply	other threads:[~2004-04-01  0:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-04-01  0:11 Brian Ford [this message]
2004-04-01 17:22 ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-01 18:00   ` Brian Ford
2004-04-01 21:29     ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-01 22:54       ` Brian Ford
2004-04-02  7:45         ` Eli Zaretskii
     [not found]           ` <Pine dot GSO dot 4 dot 58 dot 0404021000390 dot 21204 at thing1-200>
     [not found]             ` <2719-Fri02Apr2004213907+0300-eliz at gnu dot org>
     [not found]               ` <Pine dot GSO dot 4 dot 58 dot 0404021648050 dot 21204 at thing1-200>
2004-04-02 17:31           ` Brian Ford
2004-04-02 19:42             ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-02 23:15               ` Brian Ford
2004-04-03  9:08                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-05 18:18                   ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-05 21:57                     ` Brian Ford
2004-04-18 16:33                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-05 18:21                   ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-05 22:46                   ` Brian Ford
2004-04-18 17:00                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-05 22:46                 ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-05 23:19                   ` Brian Ford
2004-04-05 23:38                     ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-06 14:53                       ` Brian Ford
2004-04-15  9:38                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-06 23:24                     ` Mark Kettenis
2004-04-07 16:25                       ` Brian Ford
2004-04-07 18:02                         ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-07 20:06                       ` [PATCH] Rename i386_xxx_reg_to_regnum Brian Ford
2004-04-07 20:48                         ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-07 21:06                           ` Brian Ford
2004-04-07 21:41                             ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-09 12:37                               ` Mark Kettenis
2004-04-09 17:49                                 ` Brian Ford
2004-04-06 23:23                   ` [PATCH] i386_stab_reg_to_regnum (4 <-> 5, ebp <-> esp) Mark Kettenis
2004-04-07 16:46                     ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-18 16:48                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-19  2:06                     ` ix86 PE/COFF DWARF register numbering (was Re: [PATCH] i386_stab_reg_to_regnum (4 <-> 5, ebp <-> esp)) Brian Ford
2004-04-19  5:59                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-19 16:34                         ` ix86 PE/COFF DWARF register numbering Brian Ford
2004-04-19 12:42                     ` [PATCH] i386_stab_reg_to_regnum (4 <-> 5, ebp <-> esp) Jim Blandy
2004-04-19  7:02                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-02 19:33           ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-02 22:47             ` Brian Ford

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.GSO.4.58.0403311727300.21204@thing1-200 \
    --to=ford@vss.fsi.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox