From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
Cc: ford@vss.fsi.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386_stab_reg_to_regnum (4 <-> 5, ebp <-> esp)
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 16:48:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2914-Sun18Apr2004194339+0300-eliz@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <vt2ptam2gg1.fsf@zenia.home> (message from Jim Blandy on 05 Apr 2004 17:44:14 -0500)
> From: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
> Date: 05 Apr 2004 17:44:14 -0500
>
> In fact, it looks to me as if DJGPP uses dbx_register_map for both
> STABS and Dwarf 2. (Eli, is this right?)
No, that's not what I see. The file /config/i386/djgpp.h in the GCC
distribution says:
#undef DBX_REGISTER_NUMBER
#define DBX_REGISTER_NUMBER(n) \
((write_symbols == DWARF2_DEBUG) ? svr4_dbx_register_map[n] : dbx_register_map[n])
(This is from GCC 3.3.3 source distribution I find in the DJGPP
repository.)
So DJGPP uses svr4_dbx_register_map[] for DWARF-2, dbx_register_map[]
otherwise.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-18 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-01 0:11 Brian Ford
2004-04-01 17:22 ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-01 18:00 ` Brian Ford
2004-04-01 21:29 ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-01 22:54 ` Brian Ford
2004-04-02 7:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
[not found] ` <Pine dot GSO dot 4 dot 58 dot 0404021000390 dot 21204 at thing1-200>
[not found] ` <2719-Fri02Apr2004213907+0300-eliz at gnu dot org>
[not found] ` <Pine dot GSO dot 4 dot 58 dot 0404021648050 dot 21204 at thing1-200>
2004-04-02 17:31 ` Brian Ford
2004-04-02 19:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-02 23:15 ` Brian Ford
2004-04-03 9:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-05 18:18 ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-05 21:57 ` Brian Ford
2004-04-18 16:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-05 18:21 ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-05 22:46 ` Brian Ford
2004-04-18 17:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-05 22:46 ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-05 23:19 ` Brian Ford
2004-04-05 23:38 ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-06 14:53 ` Brian Ford
2004-04-15 9:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-06 23:24 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-04-07 16:25 ` Brian Ford
2004-04-07 18:02 ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-07 20:06 ` [PATCH] Rename i386_xxx_reg_to_regnum Brian Ford
2004-04-07 20:48 ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-07 21:06 ` Brian Ford
2004-04-07 21:41 ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-09 12:37 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-04-09 17:49 ` Brian Ford
2004-04-06 23:23 ` [PATCH] i386_stab_reg_to_regnum (4 <-> 5, ebp <-> esp) Mark Kettenis
2004-04-07 16:46 ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-18 16:48 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2004-04-19 2:06 ` ix86 PE/COFF DWARF register numbering (was Re: [PATCH] i386_stab_reg_to_regnum (4 <-> 5, ebp <-> esp)) Brian Ford
2004-04-19 5:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-19 16:34 ` ix86 PE/COFF DWARF register numbering Brian Ford
2004-04-19 12:42 ` [PATCH] i386_stab_reg_to_regnum (4 <-> 5, ebp <-> esp) Jim Blandy
2004-04-19 7:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-02 19:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-02 22:47 ` Brian Ford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2914-Sun18Apr2004194339+0300-eliz@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=ford@vss.fsi.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=jimb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox